Raising Orphans: How Clinical Development Programs of Drugs for Rare and Common Diseases Are Different

2012 ◽  
Vol 92 (2) ◽  
pp. 262-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Orfali ◽  
L Feldman ◽  
V Bhattacharjee ◽  
P Harkins ◽  
S Kadam ◽  
...  
2005 ◽  
pp. 249-261
Author(s):  
William Trepicchio ◽  
Monica Cahilly ◽  
Lisa Speicher ◽  
Judith Oestreicher ◽  
Michael Burczynski ◽  
...  

Drug Safety ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 751-768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subrata Ghosh ◽  
Lianne S. Gensler ◽  
Zijiang Yang ◽  
Chris Gasink ◽  
Soumya D. Chakravarty ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 340-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim Papp ◽  
Marc Bourcier ◽  
Vincent Ho ◽  
Karen Burke ◽  
Boulos Haraoui

Background: Patents on several biologies will expire in Canada in the coming years. As they expire, applications to market subsequent entry biologies (SEBs) may be filed in Canada. Objective: To provide an understanding of the regulatory pathway and types of trials used for SEB authorization in Canada. Methods: Health Canada's draft guidance on SEBs was reviewed in regards to key issues and challenges in the development and authorization of SEBs. Results: Health Canada states that SEBs are not “generic biologies” and their authorization is not a declaration of pharmaceutical or therapeutic equivalence to the originator. The agency recommends that physicians make well-informed decisions regarding therapeutic interchange. Conclusions: Decisions on how to determine the place of SEBs in clinical practice for biologic-naive patients and those already receiving biologies should be made on a case-by-case basis, considering the patient's needs, the characteristics of the biologic required, and the clinical development programs of the applicable SEB.


Drug Safety ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 809-809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subrata Ghosh ◽  
Lianne S. Gensler ◽  
Zijiang Yang ◽  
Chris Gasink ◽  
Soumya D. Chakravarty ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-222
Author(s):  
Antonio Rossi ◽  
Sara Pilotto ◽  
Luisa Carbognin ◽  
Miriam Grazia Ferrara ◽  
Lorenzo Belluomini ◽  
...  

Oncology research has changed extensively due to the possibility to categorize each cancer type into smaller subgroups based on histology and particularly on different genetic alterations due to their heterogeneity. The consequences of this heterogeneity are particularly evident in the management of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This review will discuss the benefits and challenges of incorporating precision medicine into early- through late-phase metastatic NSCLC clinical trials, discussing examples of drug development programs in oncogene- and non-oncogene-addicted NSCLC. The experiences of clinical development of crizotinib, gefitinib and osimertinib are depicted showing that when a targeted drug is administrated in a study population not selected by any biomarker, trials could produce negative results. However, the early detection of biomarker-driven biology helps to obtain a greater benefit for a selected population and can reduce the required time for drug approval. Early clinical development programs involving nivolumab, pembrolizumab and avelumab, immune checkpoint inhibitors, taught us that, beyond safety and activity, the optimal selection of patients should be based on pre-specified biomarkers. Overall, the identification of predictive biomarkers is one of the greatest challenges of NSCLC research that should be optimized with solid methodological trial designs to maximize the clinical outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document