scholarly journals Pre-emptive antiviral therapy for active CMV infection in adult allo-SCT patients guided by plasma CMV DNAemia quantitation using a real-time PCR assay: clinical experience at a single center

2013 ◽  
Vol 48 (7) ◽  
pp. 1010-1012 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Solano ◽  
B Muñoz-Cobo ◽  
E Giménez ◽  
M J Remigia ◽  
P Amat ◽  
...  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. e0227143
Author(s):  
Angela Nagel ◽  
Emmanouela Dimitrakopoulou ◽  
Norbert Teig ◽  
Peter Kern ◽  
Thomas Lücke ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 846-856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyeong Man Hong ◽  
Hazim Najjar ◽  
Mary Hawley ◽  
Richard D Press

Abstract Background: In bone marrow and stem cell transplant patients, the widespread use of preemptive cytomegalovirus (CMV) antiviral therapy necessitates faster, more precise, and more sensitive quantitative laboratory methods for serial viral load monitoring. Methods: We developed a novel CMV viral load assay using real-time PCR of plasma DNA prepared by an automated robotic workstation. Fluorescent hybridization probes directed at the glycoprotein B (gB) gene (or EcoRI D region) of CMV were used to detect and quantify PCR products. The β-globin gene was amplified in parallel to control for the efficiency of the extraction and PCR steps. Results: The assay was linear (R = 0.999) from a lower detection limit of 125 copies/mL to 5 × 109 copies/mL with a PCR efficiency of 1.975 (gB) or 2.02 (EcoRI D). The viral loads determined by PCRs directed at these two different viral targets were no different (n = 53; R = 0.928). The interassay CV was 3.5%, and the intraassay CV was 1–4%. Compared with a commercially available quantitative competitive PCR assay (Roche MONITOR; R = 0.59), the mean CMV viral load by real-time PCR was 3.1 times higher (mean ratio; P = 0.002). The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the real-time assay were 96% and 100%, respectively (n = 147), compared with 74% and 98% for a qualitative PCR assay (Roche AMPLICOR). On a subset of samples, the diagnostic sensitivity of viral culture was no greater than 50% (n = 44). Of 1115 clinical referral samples from 252 patients, 10% of the samples and 18% of the patients had low-level CMV viremia (median, 500 copies/mL). In this predominantly (85%) bone marrow transplant testing cohort, serial CMV viral load results were the predominant clinical trigger for the initiation, monitoring, and cessation of preemptive antiviral therapy. Conclusions: The combination of automated DNA preparation and semiautomated real-time fluorescent PCR detection allows for a sensitive, precise, and accurate high-throughput assay of CMV viral load that can be used as the laboratory trigger for preemptive antiviral therapy.


2000 ◽  
Vol 38 (7) ◽  
pp. 2536-2542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Utako Machida ◽  
Masahiro Kami ◽  
Takafumi Fukui ◽  
Yukumasa Kazuyama ◽  
Moritoshi Kinoshita ◽  
...  

The purpose of this study was to assess the usefulness of real-time automated PCR as a quantitative, highly reproducible, and sensitive method to detect cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA in blood specimens. Intra- and interassay precision rates were 0.89% (small number of copies [L]), 1.43% (middle number of copies [M]), and 1.12% (high number of copies [H]), and 4.46% (L), 1.51% (M), and 2.28% (H), respectively. The linearity of this assay was obtained between 10 and 107 copies/well, with a minimum detection limit of 20 copies/well. Specimens from 55 of 70 healthy subjects were found to be positive for CMV antibody, but CMV DNA was not detected in any of them. In the qualitative assessment of each specimen, the results of the CMV antigenemia assay and those of the real-time PCR assay agreed in 80% (plasma specimens), 79% (all nucleated cells), and 86% (blood) of the cases examined. For eight patients diagnosed as having CMV infection or disease, no sample was positive in the antigenemia assay earlier than in the real-time PCR assay. Furthermore, the results of this assay could be obtained within 8 h. We concluded that the real-time PCR assay is useful for rapid diagnosis of CMV infection and monitoring of clinical courses.


2016 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 180-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Solène Le Gal ◽  
Florence Robert-Gangneux ◽  
Yann Pépino ◽  
Sorya Belaz ◽  
Céline Damiani ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document