scholarly journals Vinorelbine and gemcitabine vs vinorelbine and carboplatin as first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. A phase III randomised controlled trial by the Norwegian Lung Cancer Study Group

2012 ◽  
Vol 107 (3) ◽  
pp. 442-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ø Fløtten ◽  
B H Grønberg ◽  
R Bremnes ◽  
T Amundsen ◽  
S Sundstrøm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Cancer Study Group ◽  
Lung Cancer Study Group ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
First Line Treatment

The cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab in first-line for metastatic triple negative breast cancer is heavily linked to PD-L1 level

2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522110194
Author(s):  
Jacopo Giuliani ◽  
Beatrice Mantoan ◽  
Andrea Bonetti
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Pivotal Phase ◽  
First Line Treatment

The present analysis was conducted to assess the pharmacological costs of atezolizumab as first-line treatment in triple negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Pivotal phase III randomized controlled trial (RCT) was considered. Nine hundred and two patients were included. Differences in costs between the 2 arms (atezolizumab plus nabpaclitaxel versus placebo plus nab-paclitaxel) was 17 398 €, with a cost of 7564 €per month of OS-gain in the overall population and 2485 €per month of OS-gain in PD-L1-positive (≥1) population. Combining pharmacological costs of drugs with the measure of efficacy represented by the OS, atezolizumab could be considered cost-effective in first-line treatment for triple-negative mBC only in PD-L1-positive population, but a reduction of costs is mandatory.

Randomized, Controlled Trial of Irinotecan Plus Infusional, Bolus, or Oral Fluoropyrimidines in First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results From the BICC-C Study

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (30) ◽  
pp. 4779-4786 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles S. Fuchs ◽  
John Marshall ◽  
Edith Mitchell ◽  
Rafal Wierzbicki ◽  
Vinod Ganju ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
First Line Treatment

PurposeThis phase III study compared the safety and efficacy of the following three different irinotecan-containing regimens in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: irinotecan plus infusional fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) (FOLFIRI), irinotecan plus bolus FU/LV (mIFL), and irinotecan plus oral capecitabine (CapeIRI).Patients and MethodsA total of 430 previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients were randomly assigned to receive FOLFIRI (n = 144), mIFL (n = 141), or CapeIRI (n = 145). Patients were concurrently randomly assigned to a double-blind treatment with celecoxib or placebo. After a protocol amendment, an additional 117 patients were randomly assigned to either FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab (FOLFIRI+Bev; n = 57) or mILF plus bevacizumab (mIFL+Bev; n = 60), whereas the CapeIRI arm was discontinued. The primary study end point was progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary end points of overall survival (OS), response rate, and toxicity.ResultsMedian PFS was 7.6 months for FOLFIRI, 5.9 months for mIFL (P = .004 for the comparison with FOLFIRI), and 5.8 months for CapeIRI (P = .015). Median OS was 23.1 months for FOLFIRI, 17.6 months for mIFL (P = .09), and 18.9 months for CapeIRI (P = .27). CapeIRI was associated with higher rates of severe vomiting, diarrhea, and dehydration. After the amendment to add bevacizumab, the median survival time has not yet been reached for FOLFIRI+Bev and was 19.2 months for mIFL+Bev (P = .007). FOLFIRI+Bev was associated with a higher rate of ≥ grade 3 hypertension than mIFL+Bev.ConclusionFOLFIRI and FOLFIRI+Bev offered superior activity to their comparators and were comparably safe. An infusional schedule of FU should be the preferred irinotecan-based regimen in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer.

Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin versus gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and a performance status (PS) 2: CAPPA-2 study.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8066-8066
Author(s):  
Alessandro Morabito ◽  
Vittorio Gebbia ◽  
Saverio Cinieri ◽  
Maria Grazia Viganò ◽  
Roberto Bianco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
First Line Treatment

8066 Background: Platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) is the standard treatment for patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC, but the evidence of its efficacy among ECOG PS2 pts is weak, because these pts are usually excluded from clinical trials; concern exists about tolerability and feasibility of standard CT in these pts. No prospective randomized trial has tested the addition of cisplatin to single-agent CT in pts with advanced NSCLC and PS2. Methods: CAPPA-2 was a multicentre, randomized phase III study for first-line treatment of PS2 pts with advanced NSCLC. Patients, aged 18-70, were eligible if they had stage IV or IIIB with malignant pleural effusion or metastatic supraclavicular nodes (TNM VI ed.) and adequate organ function. Patients in standard arm received gemcitabine 1,200 mg/m2 dd1 and 8.Patients in experimental arm received cispaltin 60 mg/m2 d1 plus gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 dd1 and 8. All treatments were repeated q3w, up to 4 cycles, unless disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). To have 80% power of detecting hazard ratio (HR) 0.71, corresponding to an increase in median OS from 4.8 to 6.8 months, 285 deaths were required. Results: The study was stopped in June 2012 after the enrolment of 57 pts, due to the slow accrual and the report of positive results from a similar study. Median OS was 3.0 months with single-agent gemcitabine and 5.9 months with cisplatin + gemcitabine (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28-0.98, p=0.039). Combination CT produced longer PFS (median 1.7 vs. 3.3 months, HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.27-0.89, p=0.017) and higher response rate (4% vs. 18%, p=0.19), without substantial increase in toxicity. Conclusions: Addition of cisplatin to single-agent gemcitabine improves survival as first-line treatment of PS2 patients with advanced NSCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT00526643.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document