scholarly journals Endometrial cancer and patterns of use of oestrogen replacement therapy: a cohort study

1989 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 445-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Paganini-Hill ◽  
RK Ross ◽  
BE Henderson
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Oestrogen Replacement Therapy ◽  
Patterns Of Use

scholarly journals Association Between Hormone Replacement Therapy and Development of Endometrial Cancer: Results From a Prospective US Cohort Study

2022 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Liang ◽  
Haoyan Jiao ◽  
Lingbo Qu ◽  
Hao Liu
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Hormone Replacement Therapy ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Hormone Replacement ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards

Although hormone replacement therapy (HRT) use is associated with elevated endometrial cancer(EC) risk, little evidence assesses potential effect-modifiers on HRT-related EC in a long-term follow-up. In this large-scale longitudinal cohort study, we tried to evaluate the association between different HRT types/methods use and risk of EC, and reveal this risk within different body mass index (BMI) groups. In whole cohort, 677 EC occurred during mean 11.6 years follow-up. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate multivariable-adjusted hazards ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with HRT status (never, former, or current) for risk of EC incidence. Current HRT use was not significantly associated with EC risk (HR for current vs. never HRT use: 1.13; 95% CI: 0.92, 1.38) in the whole cohort, but presented a dose-response effect on increased EC risk (HR for >10-year use vs. never HRT use: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.35, 2.21). Moreover, EC risk differed in distinct regimens or subsets (all Pinteraction < 0.05). Estrogen-only use was associated with elevated EC risk (HR for current vs. never HRT use: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.12, 2.04), but women with high BMI (> 30 kg/m2) who currently use estrogen-only harbored decreased EC risk (HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.38, 0.82) compared to counterparts without HRT use. Estrogen-only use is associated with increased EC risk, and precise monitoring of EC development for postmenopausal women with long-term HRT use are urgently needed. BMI could serve as an important surrogate to assess this risk.

MENOPAUSAL HORMONOTHERAPY IN ONCOGYNECOLOGIC PATIENTS

2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (6) ◽  
pp. 843-854
Author(s):  
Olga Novikova ◽  
Yelena Ulrikh ◽  
V. Nosov ◽  
A. Charkhifalakyan
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Hormone Replacement Therapy ◽  
Hormone Therapy ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Hormone Replacement ◽  
Menopausal Hormone Therapy ◽  
Oncological Safety

There is presented the review of domestic and foreign references on the conserved oncological safety of the use of menopausal hormone therapy after treatment for endometrial cancer, cervical cancer, borderline and malignant ovarian tumors, various variants of sarcomas of the uterus, vulva and vaginal cancer. To the opinion of the authors the refusal to prescribe menopausal hormone therapy to patients with oncogynecologic diseases in the anamnesis is usually not justified, the category of patients, to whom hormone replacement therapy is contraindicated, is well described and mentioned in the text. In other cases sex hormones can be used to treat menopausal symptoms and improve the quality of life of patients.

Endometrial cancer risk after fertility treatment: a population-based cohort study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonia Guleria ◽  
Allan Jensen ◽  
Vanna Albieri ◽  
Bugge Nøhr ◽  
Kirsten Frederiksen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Fertility Treatment ◽  
Endometrial Cancer Risk

scholarly journals Electronic cigarettes in standard smoking cessation treatment by tobacco counselors in Flanders: E-cigarette users show similar if not higher quit rates as those using commonly recommended smoking cessation aids

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karolien Adriaens ◽  
Eline Belmans ◽  
Dinska Van Gucht ◽  
Frank Baeyens
Keyword(s):  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Electronic Cigarettes ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Smoking Abstinence ◽  
Smoking Cessation Treatment ◽  
Cessation Treatment ◽  
Point Prevalence Abstinence

Abstract Background This interventional-cohort study tried to answer if people who smoke and choose an e-cigarette in the context of smoking cessation treatment by tobacco counselors in Flanders are achieving smoking abstinence and how they compare to clients who opt for commonly recommended (or no) aids (nicotine replacement therapy, smoking cessation medication). Methods Participants were recruited by tobacco counselors. They followed smoking cessation treatment (in group) for 2 months. At several times during treatment and 7 months after quit date, participants were asked to fill out questionnaires and to perform eCO measurements. Results One third of all participants (n = 244) achieved smoking abstinence 7 months after the quit date, with e-cigarette users having higher chances to be smoking abstinent at the final session compared to NRT users. Point prevalence abstinence rates across all follow-up measurements, however, as well as continuous and prolonged smoking abstinence, were similar in e-cigarette users and in clients having chosen a commonly recommended (or no) smoking cessation aid. No differences were obtained between smoking cessation aids with respect to product use and experiences. Conclusions People who smoke and choose e-cigarettes in the context of smoking cessation treatment by tobacco counselors show similar if not higher smoking cessation rates compared to those choosing other evidence-based (or no) smoking cessation aids.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document