scholarly journals Needle breakage following inferior alveolar nerve block: implications and management

BDJ ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 202 (7) ◽  
pp. 395-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ethunandan ◽  
A. L. Tran ◽  
R. Anand ◽  
J. Bowden ◽  
M. T. Seal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Block ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block ◽  
Needle Breakage

scholarly journals RCT on the effectiveness of the intraligamentary anesthesia and inferior alveolar nerve block on pain during dental treatment

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bahaa R. Youssef ◽  
Andreas Söhnel ◽  
Alexander Welk ◽  
Mohamed H. Abudrya ◽  
Mohamed Baider ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Dental Treatment ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block ◽  
Posterior Teeth ◽  
Mandibular Posterior Teeth ◽  
Numeric Rating

Abstract Objective To compare the effectiveness and complications of intraligamentary anesthesia (ILA) with conventional inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) during injection and dental treatment of mandibular posterior teeth. Materials and methods In this randomized, prospective clinical trial, 72 patients (39 males, 33 females), scheduled for dental treatment of mandibular posterior teeth, were randomly allocated to ILA group (n = 35) received ILA injection or IANB group (n = 37) received the conventional IANB. Our primary outcome was to assess pain and stress (discomfort) during the injection and dental treatment, using the numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain, 10= the worst pain imaginable), whereas recording 24-h postoperative complications was our secondary outcomes. Results Patients in ILA group reported significantly less pain during injection when compared with IANB group (p = 0.03), while pain during dental treatment was similar in both groups (p = 0.2). Patients in both groups also reported similar law values of discomfort during treatment (p = 0.7). Although no signs of nerve contact or any other postoperative complications were observed, five patients in IANB group (none in ILA group) reported temporary irritations. Conclusion This study showed equivalent effectiveness of both intraligamentary anesthesia and conventional inferior alveolar nerve block, for pain control during routine dental treatment of mandibular posterior teeth. Nevertheless, ILA showed significantly less pain during injection. No major postoperative complications in both groups were observed. Clinical relevance ILA could be considered as an effective alternative for routine dental treatment. Trial registration NCT04563351

Inferior alveolar nerve block and third-molar agenesis

2013 ◽  
Vol 144 (4) ◽  
pp. 389-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerry Swee ◽  
Anthony R. Silvestri ◽  
Matthew D. Finkelman ◽  
Alfred P. Rich ◽  
Stanley A. Alexander ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Block ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block ◽  
Third Molar Agenesis

A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ANESTHETIC EFFICACY OF 4% ARTICAINE WITH 1:100000 EPINEPHRINE AND 2% LIDOCAINE WITH 1:100000 EPINEPHRINE FOR INFERIOR ALVEOLAR NERVE BLOCK AND LONG BUCCAL NERVE BLOCK DURING ROOT CANAL TREATMENT: AN IN VIVO STUDY

2021 ◽  
pp. 56-59
Author(s):  
Nupur Vasava ◽  
Chintan Joshi ◽  
Vaishali Parekh
Keyword(s):  
Local Anesthesia ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Root Canal Treatment ◽  
Anesthetic Techniques ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Irreversible Pulpitis

Background: It is important to control the pain associated with root canal treatment (RCT) in endodontic. Pain accompanying fear and anxiety due to endodontic treatment can be reduced by anesthetic techniques. The present study aims to compare the effect of articaine versus lidocaine local anesthesia for inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) and long buccal nerve block on pain during RCT. METHODS: Twenty patients diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis of mandibular posterior tooth were selected. The patients randomly received either cartridge of lidocaine or articaine using IANB and long buccal nerve block. The patients were randomly divided into two groups of ten. Group 1: patients received IANB and long buccal nerve block 2% lidocaine with 1:100000 epinephrine. Group 2: patients received IANB and long buccal nerve block with 4% articaine with 1:100000 epinephrine. Before the Injection, the patient received all information about the visual analysis scale (VAS). Pain was evaluated using VAS scale in numberic value 1 to 10 number. The pain was evaluated at three different stages: before administration of LA, after immediate access opening, and after immediate obturation procedure. Data were analyzed using various suitable statistical tests. RESULT: The mean value of efcacy of pain before administration of local anesthesia (LA) was 8.50 ± 0.97 for lidocaine and 8.30 ± 0.48 for articaine had no signicant difference. A signicant difference was observed at two different duration after immediate access opening and after immediate obturation where articaine has a lower mean value 3.60 ± 1.08 and 1.60 ± 0.17 respectively (P>0.05) as compared to the mean value of lidocaine 4.10 ± 1.10 and 1.60 ± 0.17 respectively Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study, in cases of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis articaine 4% did not alleviate pain much and showed better anesthetic efcacy than 2% lidocaine with IANB and long buccal nerve block.

scholarly journals 4% lidocaine versus 4% articaine for inferior alveolar nerve block in impacted lower third molar surgery

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiatanant Boonsiriseth ◽  
Sittipong Chaimanakarn ◽  
Prued Chewpreecha ◽  
Natee Nonpassopon ◽  
Manop Khanijou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Block ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Third Molar Surgery ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document