The Nature Biotechnology 1999 New Year quiz

10.1038/5277 ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-90
Author(s):  
John Hodgson ◽  
Andrew Marshall ◽  
Emma Dorey
Keyword(s):  
Nature Biotechnology

20 years of Nature Biotechnology bioengineering research

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 267-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura DeFrancesco ◽  
Charles Schmidt ◽  
Emily Waltz
Keyword(s):  
Nature Biotechnology

scholarly journals Erratum: 20 years of Nature Biotechnology biomedical research

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 666-666
Author(s):  
Anna Azvolinsky ◽  
Charles Schmidt ◽  
Emily Waltz ◽  
Sarah Webb
Keyword(s):  
Biomedical Research ◽  
Nature Biotechnology

scholarly journals Bio/Technology to become Nature Biotechnology

1996 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-7
Author(s):  
Susan Hassler
Keyword(s):  
Nature Biotechnology

scholarly journals Enter Nature Biotechnology

Nature ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 379 (6562) ◽  
pp. 191-191 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Nature Biotechnology

Constructing the Biotech Nonhuman Animal: Instrumentalism and Ambivalence

2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 439-458
Author(s):  
Sari Ung-Lanki
Keyword(s):  
Discourse Analysis ◽  
Moral Status ◽  
Scientific Journal ◽  
Science And Society ◽  
Nature Biotechnology ◽  
Animal Mind ◽  
Nonhuman Animals ◽  
Human Animal ◽  
Insight Into

This article was designed to give insight into the role of biotechnology in redefining the complex human-animal relations of our times. In particular, it is used to examine accounts of nonhuman animals and animal usage in the context of biotechnology, as covered in the leading scientific journalNature Biotechnology. Data consist of editorials, commentaries, and research news for four years (N= 104), and has been analyzed using discourse analysis. The journal constructs a consistent, yet one-sided, view on animals as they are represented through physico-material, technical and biomedical discourses, as well as discourses on human benefits and manageable risks. The biotechnological epistemology of the animal is positioned at the far end of the subjectification-instrumentalization continuum in our treatment of other animals. It also clashes with simultaneous discussions on animal mind, subjectivity, and moral status. These developments are likely to further intensify the discrepancies in human-animal relations in science and society.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document