Growth processes in teeth distinguish modern humans from Homo erectus and earlier hominins

Nature ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 414 (6864) ◽  
pp. 628-631 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Dean ◽  
Meave G. Leakey ◽  
Donald Reid ◽  
Friedemann Schrenk ◽  
Gary T. Schwartz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Homo Erectus ◽  
Modern Humans ◽  
Growth Processes

scholarly journals Recent origin of low trabecular bone density in modern humans

2014 ◽  
Vol 112 (2) ◽  
pp. 366-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Habiba Chirchir ◽  
Tracy L. Kivell ◽  
Christopher B. Ruff ◽  
Jean-Jacques Hublin ◽  
Kristian J. Carlson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Trabecular Bone ◽  
Homo Sapiens ◽  
Modern Human ◽  
Homo Erectus ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
Modern Humans ◽  
Human Skeleton ◽  
Trabecular Density ◽  
Fossil Hominins

Humans are unique, compared with our closest living relatives (chimpanzees) and early fossil hominins, in having an enlarged body size and lower limb joint surfaces in combination with a relatively gracile skeleton (i.e., lower bone mass for our body size). Some analyses have observed that in at least a few anatomical regions modern humans today appear to have relatively low trabecular density, but little is known about how that density varies throughout the human skeleton and across species or how and when the present trabecular patterns emerged over the course of human evolution. Here, we test the hypotheses that (i) recent modern humans have low trabecular density throughout the upper and lower limbs compared with other primate taxa and (ii) the reduction in trabecular density first occurred in early Homo erectus, consistent with the shift toward a modern human locomotor anatomy, or more recently in concert with diaphyseal gracilization in Holocene humans. We used peripheral quantitative CT and microtomography to measure trabecular bone of limb epiphyses (long bone articular ends) in modern humans and chimpanzees and in fossil hominins attributed to Australopithecus africanus, Paranthropus robustus/early Homo from Swartkrans, Homo neanderthalensis, and early Homo sapiens. Results show that only recent modern humans have low trabecular density throughout the limb joints. Extinct hominins, including pre-Holocene Homo sapiens, retain the high levels seen in nonhuman primates. Thus, the low trabecular density of the recent modern human skeleton evolved late in our evolutionary history, potentially resulting from increased sedentism and reliance on technological and cultural innovations.

scholarly journals Homoplasy in the evolution of modern human-like joint proportions in Australopithecus afarensis

eLife ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anjali M Prabhat ◽  
Catherine K Miller ◽  
Thomas Cody Prang ◽  
Jeffrey Spear ◽  
Scott A Williams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Upper Limb ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Modern Human ◽  
Homo Erectus ◽  
Australopithecus Afarensis ◽  
Modern Humans ◽  
Homo Habilis ◽  
Hominin Evolution ◽  
Parsimonious Explanation ◽  
Phylogenetic Hypotheses

The evolution of bipedalism and reduced reliance on arboreality in hominins resulted in larger lower limb joints relative to the joints of the upper limb. The pattern and timing of this transition, however, remains unresolved. Here, we find the limb joint proportions of Australopithecus afarensis, Homo erectus, and Homo naledi to resemble those of modern humans, whereas those of A. africanus, Australopithecus sediba, Paranthropus robustus, Paranthropus boisei, Homo habilis, and Homo floresiensis are more ape-like. The homology of limb joint proportions in A. afarensis and modern humans can only be explained by a series of evolutionary reversals irrespective of differing phylogenetic hypotheses. Thus, the independent evolution of modern human-like limb joint proportions in A. afarensis is a more parsimonious explanation. Overall, these results support an emerging perspective in hominin paleobiology that A. afarensis was the most terrestrially adapted australopith despite the importance of arboreality throughout much of early hominin evolution.

scholarly journals Arguments that Prehistorical and Modern Humans Belong to the Same Species

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rainer Kühne
Keyword(s):  
Homo Sapiens ◽  
Single Species ◽  
Homo Erectus ◽  
Modern Humans ◽  
Homo Neanderthalensis ◽  
Out Of Africa

I argue that the evidence of the Out-of-Africa hypothesis and the evidence of multiregional evolution of prehistorical humans can be understood if there has been interbreeding between Homo erectus, Homo neanderthalensis, and Homo sapiens at least during the preceding 700,000 years. These interbreedings require descendants who are capable of reproduction and therefore parents who belong to the same species. I suggest that a number of prehistorical humans who are at present regarded as belonging to different species belong in fact to one single species.  

Fractal dimension of the middle meningeal vessels: variation and evolution in Homo erectus , Neanderthals, and modern humans

2006 ◽  
Vol 42 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 217-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emiliano Bruner ◽  
Simone Mantini ◽  
Agostino Perna ◽  
Carlotta Maffei ◽  
Giorgio Manzi
Keyword(s):  
Fractal Dimension ◽  
Homo Erectus ◽  
Modern Humans

scholarly journals The challenge of the abstract mind: symbols, signs and notational systems in European prehistory

2005 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 221-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harald Haarmann
Keyword(s):  
Homo Sapiens ◽  
Homo Erectus ◽  
Main Theme ◽  
Writing System ◽  
Southeastern Europe ◽  
Modern Humans ◽  
Symbiotic Interaction ◽  
Homo Neanderthalensis ◽  
Cave Paintings ◽  
Naturalistic Pictures

Since the earliest manifestations of symbolic activity in modern humans (Homo sapiens sapiens) in the Upper Palaeolithic, there is evidence for two independent cognitive procedures, for the production of representational images (naturalistic pictures or sculptures) and of abstract signs. The use of signs and symbols is attested for archaic humans (Homo neanderthalensis) and for Homo erectus while art in naturalistic style is an innovation among modern humans. The symbiotic interaction of the two symbolic capacities is illustrated for the visual heritage of Palaeolithic cave paintings in Southwestern Europe, for rock engravings in the Italian Alps (Val Camonica) and for the vivid use of signs and symbols in Southeastern Europe during the Neolithic. Around 5500 BC, sign use in Southeastern Europe reached a sophisticated stage of organization as to produce the earliest writing system of mankind. Since abstractness is the main theme in the visual heritage of the region, this script, not surprisingly, is composed of predominantly abstract signs.

scholarly journals Asymmetries of Cerebellar Lobe in the Genus Homo

Symmetry ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 988
Author(s):  
Yameng Zhang ◽  
Xiujie Wu
Keyword(s):  
Small Sample Size ◽  
Morphological Difference ◽  
Brain Evolution ◽  
Major Axis ◽  
Homo Erectus ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Modern Humans ◽  
Horizontal Orientation ◽  
Genus Homo ◽  
Evolutionary Changes

The endocast was paid great attention in the study of human brain evolution. However, compared to that of the cerebrum, the cerebellar lobe is poorly studied regarding its morphology, function, and evolutionary changes in the process of human evolution. In this study, we define the major axis and four measurements to inspect possible asymmetric patterns within the genus Homo. Results show that significant asymmetry is only observed for the cerebellar length in modern humans and is absent in Homo erectus and Neanderthals. The influence of occipital petalia is obscure due to the small sample size for H. erectus and Neanderthals, while it has a significant influence over the asymmetries of cerebellar height and horizontal orientation in modern humans. Although the length and height of the Neanderthal cerebellum are comparable to that of modern humans, its sagittal orientation is closer to that of H. erectus, which is wider than that of modern humans. The cerebellar morphological difference between Neanderthals and modern humans is suggested to be related to high cognitive activities, such as social factors and language ability.

scholarly journals The human genome reveals the evolution of Homo sapiens

2021 ◽  
Vol 134 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-45
Author(s):  
K. Schwartz ◽  
◽  
M. Sorokin ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Human Genome ◽  
Homo Sapiens ◽  
Genetic Research ◽  
Modern Human ◽  
Homo Erectus ◽  
Max Planck ◽  
Modern Humans ◽  
Language Communication ◽  
History Of ◽  
Development Of Language

The evolution of modern humans began two and a half million years ago as Homo erectus. Several hundred thousand years ago, Neanderthals, Denisovans, and modern men Homo sapiens have been separated from the Homo erectus branch. Nevertheless, Homo sapiens is the only one that has survived to our days. The complex history of Homo is revealed by genetic research and comparison of the modern human genome with genes of Neanderthals and Denisovans. Svante Pääbo, a professor at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, made a significant contribution to these studies and decoded the genome of Neanderthals and Denisovans. Comparison of the genome of modern humans with the genes of Neanderthals and Denisovans made it possible to reveal the size of the population, the paths and times of migrations, interactions of various groups of ancient humans and their biological crossing. It was found that in Eurasia, modern man carries traces of Neanderthal genes, whereas in Asia and Oceania – Denisovan genes. According to anthropological research, the survival of Homo sapiens was driven by the cognitive revolution, which took place about seventy thousand years ago and included the development of language, communication and association in large groups.

scholarly journals Comment on: The Vitamin D–Folate Hypothesis as an Evolutionary Model for Skin Pigmentation: An Update and Integration of Current Ideas, Nutrients 2018, 10, 554

Nutrients ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 1753 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Elias ◽  
Mary Williams
Keyword(s):  
Vitamin D ◽  
Recent Article ◽  
Skin Pigmentation ◽  
Evolutionary Model ◽  
Homo Erectus ◽  
Modern Humans ◽  
Distinctive Features

In response to a recent article by Jones et al. (Nutrients 10: 554–568, 2018) [1], we agree that three distinctive features evolved in Homo erectus prior to the emergence of modern humans.[...]

Problems in the Stone Age of South-east Asia Revisited

2007 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 39-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. E. G. Reynolds
Keyword(s):  
Tropical Forests ◽  
Tool Use ◽  
Stone Tools ◽  
Homo Erectus ◽  
Stone Tool ◽  
South East Asia ◽  
Stone Age ◽  
Modern Humans ◽  
The World ◽  
Out Of Africa

In the 13 years since ‘Problems in the Stone Age of Southeast Asia’ was published, there has been a number of significant developments. There remains a lack of early cultural material despite the possibility that first occupation of the area may date back as far as 1.8 Myrs. It seems that the first hominins in the region were essentially ‘alithic’ in their adaptation, making the reconstruction of their behaviour extremely difficult. There is also a question as to which hominin was first ‘Out of Africa’ and into Asia and a suggestion that Homo erectus is, in fact, an Asian species that may have migrated west. This has important implications for interpretations of the significance of the so-called ‘Movius Line’. By the time stone tool use does appear regularly in the record, modern humans are present but it is still hard to identify the kinds of directional changes that are associated with the Late Pleistocene elsewhere in the world. The question of when humans were able to exploit tropical forests in the region is also one that recent work explores. The recent discoveries from Flores of stone tools that appear to pre-date the arrival of modern humans, and a possibly associated ‘dwarf’ hominin, Homo floresiensis, all require re-appraisal of the nature of human activity in the region.

scholarly journals Early development of the Neanderthal ribcage reveals a different body shape at birth compared to modern humans

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (41) ◽  
pp. eabb4377
Author(s):  
Daniel García-Martínez ◽  
Markus Bastir ◽  
Asier Gómez-Olivencia ◽  
Bruno Maureille ◽  
Liubov Golovanova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Geometric Morphometrics ◽  
Early Development ◽  
Body Shape ◽  
Homo Erectus ◽  
Modern Humans ◽  
Extinct Species ◽  
3D Morphology ◽  
Virtual Reconstruction ◽  
Roc De Marsal ◽  
Species Specific

Ontogenetic studies provide clues for understanding important paleobiological aspects of extinct species. When compared to that of modern humans, the adult Neanderthal thorax was shorter, deeper, and wider. This is related to the wide Neanderthal body and is consistent with their hypothetical large requirements for energy and oxygen. Whether these differences were already established at birth or appeared later during development is unknown. To delve into this question, we use virtual reconstruction tools and geometric morphometrics to recover the 3D morphology of the ribcages of four Neanderthal individuals from birth to around 3 years old: Mezmaiskaya 1, Le Moustier 2, Dederiyeh 1, and Roc de Marsal. Our results indicate that the comparatively deep and short ribcage of the Neanderthals was already present at birth, as were other skeletal species-specific traits. This morphology possibly represents the plesiomorphic condition shared with Homo erectus, and it is likely linked to large energetic requirements.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document