Asymmetric cell division during animal development

2001 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juergen A. Knoblich
Keyword(s):  
Cell Division ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Division ◽  
Animal Development

Centromere assembly and non-random sister chromatid segregation in stem cells

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben L. Carty ◽  
Elaine M. Dunleavy
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Division ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Germline Stem Cells ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Centromere Protein A ◽  
Oocyte Meiosis

Abstract Asymmetric cell division (ACD) produces daughter cells with separate distinct cell fates and is critical for the development and regulation of multicellular organisms. Epigenetic mechanisms are key players in cell fate determination. Centromeres, epigenetically specified loci defined by the presence of the histone H3-variant, centromere protein A (CENP-A), are essential for chromosome segregation at cell division. ACDs in stem cells and in oocyte meiosis have been proposed to be reliant on centromere integrity for the regulation of the non-random segregation of chromosomes. It has recently been shown that CENP-A is asymmetrically distributed between the centromeres of sister chromatids in male and female Drosophila germline stem cells (GSCs), with more CENP-A on sister chromatids to be segregated to the GSC. This imbalance in centromere strength correlates with the temporal and asymmetric assembly of the mitotic spindle and potentially orientates the cell to allow for biased sister chromatid retention in stem cells. In this essay, we discuss the recent evidence for asymmetric sister centromeres in stem cells. Thereafter, we discuss mechanistic avenues to establish this sister centromere asymmetry and how it ultimately might influence cell fate.

scholarly journals Replicative Aging in Pathogenic Fungi

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 6
Author(s):  
Somanon Bhattacharya ◽  
Tejas Bouklas ◽  
Bettina C. Fries
Keyword(s):  
Cell Division ◽  
Candida Glabrata ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Division ◽  
Pathogenic Fungi ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Candida Auris ◽  
Replicative Aging ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Phenotypic Variations ◽  
Systemic Infections

Candida albicans, Candida auris, Candida glabrata, and Cryptococcus neoformans are pathogenic yeasts which can cause systemic infections in immune-compromised as well as immune-competent individuals. These yeasts undergo replicative aging analogous to a process first described in the nonpathogenic yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The hallmark of replicative aging is the asymmetric cell division of mother yeast cells that leads to the production of a phenotypically distinct daughter cell. Several techniques to study aging that have been pioneered in S. cerevisiae have been adapted to study aging in other pathogenic yeasts. The studies indicate that aging is relevant for virulence in pathogenic fungi. As the mother yeast cell progressively ages, every ensuing asymmetric cell division leads to striking phenotypic changes, which results in increased antifungal and antiphagocytic resistance. This review summarizes the various techniques that are used to study replicative aging in pathogenic fungi along with their limitations. Additionally, the review summarizes some key phenotypic variations that have been identified and are associated with changes in virulence or resistance and thus promote persistence of older cells.

scholarly journals A spatiotemporal molecular switch governs plant asymmetric cell division

Nature Plants ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyu Guo ◽  
Chan Ho Park ◽  
Zhi-Yong Wang ◽  
Bryce E. Nickels ◽  
Juan Dong
Keyword(s):  
Cell Division ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Division ◽  
Molecular Switch
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document