Segregation of MHC class II molecules from MHC class I molecules in the Golgi complex for transport to lysosomal compartments

Nature ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 349 (6311) ◽  
pp. 669-676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Peters ◽  
Jacques J. Neefjes ◽  
Viola Oorschot ◽  
Hidde L. Ploegh ◽  
Hans J. Geuze
1994 ◽  
Vol 107 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Lang ◽  
C. de Chastellier ◽  
C. Frehel ◽  
R. Hellio ◽  
P. Metezeau ◽  
...  

Macrophages, being apparently the only cells that in vivo allow the growth of the intracellular pathogen Leishmania, are likely candidates to present antigens to Leishmania-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, known to be involved in the resolution or in the development of lesions induced by these parasites, and recognizing processed antigens bound to MHC class I and MHC class II molecules, respectively. In the present study, we analysed by confocal microscopy and by immunoelectron microscopy the subcellular distribution of both MHC class I and class II molecules in mouse (Balb/c and C57BL/6 strains) bone marrow-derived macrophages infected for 12 to 48 hours with Leishmania amazonensis amastigotes and activated with gamma interferon to determine the intracellular sites where Leishmania antigens and MHC molecules meet and can possibly interact. Double labelings with anti-MHC molecule antibodies and with either propidium iodide or an anti-amastigote antibody allowed localization of MHC molecules with regard to the endocytic compartments housing Leishmania amastigotes, organelles known as the parasitophorous vacuoles (PV) and which most likely contain the highest concentration of parasite antigens in the host cell. Both uninfected and infected macrophages from Balb/c mice expressed the MHC class I molecules H-2Kd and H-2Dd on their cell surface but no significant amount of these molecules could be detected in the PV, which indicates that, if infected macrophages play a role in the induction of Leishmania-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes, PV are probably not loading compartments for MHC class I molecules. In contrast, MHC class II molecules were found to be associated with the PV membranes as shown previously with microscopic techniques at lower resolution (Antoine et al. Infect. Immun. 59, 764–775, 1991). In addition, we show here that, 48 hours after infection of Balb/c macrophages, in about 90% of PV containing MHC class II molecules, the latter were mainly or solely localized at the attachment zone of amastigotes to PV membranes. This peculiar distribution, especially well demonstrated using confocal microscopy, was confirmed by subcellular fluorescence cytometry of infected macrophages stained for the MHC class II molecules. The following data agree with the idea that PV-associated MHC class II molecules establish specific interactions with plasma membrane components of amastigotes. First, the polarized localization of class II appeared specific to these molecules, since the distribution of the lysosomal glycoproteins Igp110 and Igp120, of the macrosialin (a macrophage-specific marker of endocytic compartments) and of the GTP-binding protein rab7p, shown here as being PV membrane components, was homogeneous.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 724-737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth L. Rock ◽  
Eric Reits ◽  
Jacques Neefjes

Immunology ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 128 (1pt2) ◽  
pp. e432-e441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosângela M. Rodrigues ◽  
Neide M. Silva ◽  
Ana Lúcia R. Gonçalves ◽  
Cristina R. Cardoso ◽  
Ronaldo Alves ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 144-156
Author(s):  
Şule KARATAŞ ◽  
Fatma SAVRAN OĞUZ

Introduction: Peptides obtained by processing intracellular and extracellular antigens are presented to T cells to stimulate the immune response. This presentation is made by peptide receptors called major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules. The regulation mechanisms of MHC molecules, which have similar roles in the immune response, especially at the gene level, have significant differences according to their class. Objective: Class I and class II MHC molecules encoded by MHC genes on the short arm of the sixth chromosome are peptide receptors that stimulate T cell response. These peptides, which will enable the recognition of the antigen from which they originate, are loaded into MHC molecules and presented to T cells. Although the principles of loading and delivering peptides are similar for both molecules, the peptide sources and peptide loading mechanisms are different. In addition, class I molecules are expressed in all nucleated cells while class II molecules are expressed only in Antigen Presentation Cells (APC). These differences; It shows that MHC class I is not expressed by exactly the same transcriptional mechanisms as MHC class II. In our article, we aimed to compare the gene expressions of both classes and reveal their similarities and differences. Discussion and Conclusion: A better understanding of the transcriptional mechanisms of MHC molecules will reveal the role of these molecules in diseases more clearly. In our review, we discussed MHC gene regulation mechanisms with presence of existing informations, which is specific to the MHC class, for contribute to future research. Keywords: MHC class I, MHC class II, MHC gene regulation, promoter, SXY module, transcription


Immunology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 132 (4) ◽  
pp. 482-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingjun Wang ◽  
Sheila T. Tang ◽  
Anette Stryhn ◽  
Sune Justesen ◽  
Mette V. Larsen ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 823-836 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacques Neefjes ◽  
Marlieke L. M. Jongsma ◽  
Petra Paul ◽  
Oddmund Bakke

1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 297-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacques Robert ◽  
Chantal Guiet ◽  
Louis Du Pasquier

Three new lymphoid tumors offering an assortment of variants in terms of MHC class I expressions, MHC class II expression, and Ig gene transcription have been discovered in the amphibianXenopus. One was developed in an individual of the isogenic LG15 clone (LG15/0), one in a frog of the LG15/40 clone (derived from a small egg recombinant of LG15), and one (ff-2) in a maleffsib of the individual in which MAR1, the first lymphoid tumor in Xenopus was found 2 years ago. These tumors developed primarily as thymus outgrowths and were transplantable in histocompatible tadpoles but not in nonhistocompatible hosts. Whereas LG15/0 and LG15/40 tumor cells also grow in adult LG15 frogs, theff-2 tumor, like the MAR1 cell line, is rejected by adultffanimals. Using flow cytometry with fluorescence-labeled antibodies and immunoprecipitation analysis, we could demonstrate that, like MAR1, these three new tumors express on their cell surface lymphopoietic markers recognized by mAbs FIF6 and RC47, as well as T-cell lineage markers recognized by mAbs AM22 (CD8-1ike) and X21.2, but not by immunologobulin (Ig) nor MHC class II molecules. Another lymphocyte-specific marker AM15 is expressed by 15/0 and 15/40 but notff-2 tumor cells. Theff-2 tumor cell expresses MHC class molecule in association withβ2-microglobulin on the surface, 15/40 cells contain cytoplasmic Iαchain that is barely detected at the cell surface by fluocytometry, and 15/0 cells do not synthesize class Iαchain at all. The three new tumors all produce large amounts of IgM mRNA of two different sizes but no Ig protein on the membrane nor in the cytoplasm. All tumor cell types synthesize large amount of Myc mRNA and MHC class I-like transcripts considered to be non classical.


2010 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 483-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerd Meyer zu Hörste ◽  
Holger Heidenreich ◽  
Anne K. Mausberg ◽  
Helmar C. Lehmann ◽  
Anneloor L.M.A. ten Asbroek ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document