Calibration of the magnetic compass of a migratory bird by celestial rotation

Nature ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 347 (6291) ◽  
pp. 378-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth P. Able ◽  
Mary A. Able
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 627-640
Author(s):  
Tushar Tyagi ◽  
Sanjay Kumar Bhardwaj

The navigational systems of different animal species are by a wide margin less notable as compared to birds. Humans have been interested in how migratory birds discover their way more than thousands of miles for quite a long time. This review summarizes the cues and compass mechanisms applied in orientation and navigation by non-migrants, diurnal and nocturnal migrants. The magnetic compass, landmarks, olfactory, and memory of spatial cues en route were utilized in homing and migration. The equivalent is valid for the sun compass despite the fact that its job during migration might be undeniably less significant than commonly presumed. Stellar compass and celestial rotation, as a result of their nighttime accessibility, appear to influence the direction of nighttime migrants during the course of migration. The celestial cues go through notable changes because of the latitude shift during bird migration. Sunset cues alter their location with seasons and latitudes. The recognizable stars lose height and lastly vanish underneath the horizon, whereas new stars show up. These new ones must be calibrated. As celestial rotation not imparting a reference, it is not unexpected that the magnetic compass turns into the main cue that controls the directional importance of stars and sunset cues. Field studies have revealed that, in certain species, a considerable extent of individuals get back to similar breeding, overwintering, and stopover areas in progressive years. This review proposes that migratory birds have advanced uncommon cognitive capacities that empower them to achieve these accomplishments.      


1997 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ursula Munro ◽  
John A. Munro ◽  
John B. Phillips ◽  
Wolfgang Wiltschko

Two hypotheses on magnetoreception in animals are currently discussed. The first hypothesis is based on light-dependent processes associated with the visual system, while the second hypothesis suggests that magnetoreception is based on biogenic magnetite. Both mechanisms are supported by experimental evidence, but whether the information they provide involves the magnetic compass or the ‘map’ is still open. In order to identify the relevance of light-dependent or magnetite-transduced processes in magnetoreception, juvenile migratory birds were tested for their orientation behaviour in the natural geomagnetic field as the only directional cue available to them. The test birds were juvenile Tasmanian silvereyes (Zosterops l. lateralis), which were caught on their native island soon after fledging, before they had an opportunity to establish a navigational ‘map’. (1) Under ‘white’ (full spectrum) and green light (571 nm), they were well oriented in their appropriate migratory direction, while they were disoriented under red light (633 nm). This coincides with previous findings on adult silvereyes and suggests that light-dependent processes are involved in an orientation mechanism used by both juvenile and adult migrants, namely the magnetic compass. (2) A short, high-intensity magnetic pulse, a treatment designed to alter the magnetisation of magnetite, did not affect the young birds´ orientation. They continued to select their seasonally appropriate migratory direction. In contrast, adult silvereyes from the same population had responded in a previous study with a 90° clockwise deflection from their normal migratory course. These results suggest that (a) magnetite is involved in an orientation mechanism used exclusively by adult migrants; and (b) a magnetite-based receptor is associated with the navigational ‘map’, which provides information on geographic position.


Nature ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 461 (7268) ◽  
pp. 1274-1277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuela Zapka ◽  
Dominik Heyers ◽  
Christine M. Hein ◽  
Svenja Engels ◽  
Nils-Lasse Schneider ◽  
...  

Nature ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 419 (6906) ◽  
pp. 467-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Wiltschko ◽  
Joachim Traudt ◽  
Onur Güntürkün ◽  
Helmut Prior ◽  
Roswitha Wiltschko

e-Neuroforum ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Wiltschko ◽  
Joachim Traudt ◽  
Onur Güntürkün ◽  
Helmut Prior ◽  
Roswitha Wiltschko

2012 ◽  
Vol 279 (1745) ◽  
pp. 4230-4235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis Gehring ◽  
Wolfgang Wiltschko ◽  
Onur Güntürkün ◽  
Susanne Denzau ◽  
Roswitha Wiltschko

The magnetic compass of a migratory bird, the European robin ( Erithacus rubecula ), was shown to be lateralized in favour of the right eye/left brain hemisphere. However, this seems to be a property of the avian magnetic compass that is not present from the beginning, but develops only as the birds grow older. During first migration in autumn, juvenile robins can orient by their magnetic compass with their right as well as with their left eye. In the following spring, however, the magnetic compass is already lateralized, but this lateralization is still flexible: it could be removed by covering the right eye for 6 h. During the following autumn migration, the lateralization becomes more strongly fixed, with a 6 h occlusion of the right eye no longer having an effect. This change from a bilateral to a lateralized magnetic compass appears to be a maturation process, the first such case known so far in birds. Because both eyes mediate identical information about the geomagnetic field, brain asymmetry for the magnetic compass could increase efficiency by setting the other hemisphere free for other processes.


Nature ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 509 (7500) ◽  
pp. 353-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Svenja Engels ◽  
Nils-Lasse Schneider ◽  
Nele Lefeldt ◽  
Christine Maira Hein ◽  
Manuela Zapka ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
John B. Phillips ◽  
R. Muheim ◽  
N. M. Edgar ◽  
K. S. Sloan

Author(s):  
Janet M. Ruth ◽  
Albert Manville ◽  
Ron Larkin ◽  
Wylie C. Barrow ◽  
Lori Johnson-Randall ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document