scholarly journals Gaze control during interceptive actions with different spatiotemporal demands.

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 783-793 ◽  
Author(s):  
José A. Navia ◽  
Matt Dicks ◽  
John van der Kamp ◽  
Luis M. Ruiz
Keyword(s):  
Gaze Control ◽  
Interceptive Actions

Visuomotor delay in interceptive actions

2008 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 200-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Benguigui ◽  
Robin Baurès ◽  
Cyrille Le Runigo
Keyword(s):  
Interceptive Actions

AbstractNeural delays, which are generally defined as visuomotor delays in interceptive actions, must be compensated to enable accurate timing in movement. Visuomotor delays can depend on the kind of task, the use of information, and the skill of the performer. The compensation for such delays does not necessarily require prediction or representation but can be made by an attunement of some parameters in what is called a law of control.

Gaze Control for Driver Assistance Systems

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 527-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Guenthner ◽  
Lucas Ginzinger ◽  
Heinz Ulbrich
Keyword(s):  
Gaze Control ◽  
Driver Assistance ◽  
Driver Assistance Systems ◽  
Assistance Systems

scholarly journals Stakeholder consensus for decision making in eye-gaze control technology for children, adolescents and adults with cerebral palsy service provision: findings from a Delphi study

BMC Neurology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Petra Karlsson ◽  
Tom Griffiths ◽  
Michael T. Clarke ◽  
Elegast Monbaliu ◽  
Kate Himmelmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Cerebral Palsy ◽  
Delphi Study ◽  
Eye Gaze ◽  
Support Network ◽  
Advisory Panel ◽  
Gaze Control ◽  
Control Technology ◽  
Adolescents And Adults ◽  
Stakeholder Consensus

Abstract Background Limited research exists to guide clinical decisions about trialling, selecting, implementing and evaluating eye-gaze control technology. This paper reports on the outcomes of a Delphi study that was conducted to build international stakeholder consensus to inform decision making about trialling and implementing eye-gaze control technology with people with cerebral palsy. Methods A three-round online Delphi survey was conducted. In Round 1, 126 stakeholders responded to questions identified through an international stakeholder Advisory Panel and systematic reviews. In Round 2, 63 respondents rated the importance of 200 statements generated by in Round 1. In Round 3, 41 respondents rated the importance of the 105 highest ranked statements retained from Round 2. Results Stakeholders achieved consensus on 94 of the original 200 statements. These statements related to person factors, support networks, the environment, and technical aspects to consider during assessment, trial, implementation and follow-up. Findings reinforced the importance of an individualised approach and that information gathered from the user, their support network and professionals are central when measuring outcomes. Information required to support an application for funding was obtained. Conclusion This Delphi study has identified issues which are unique to eye-gaze control technology and will enhance its implementation with people with cerebral palsy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document