Binding biological motion and visual features in working memory.

2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 850-865 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaowei Ding ◽  
Yangfan Zhao ◽  
Fan Wu ◽  
Xiqian Lu ◽  
Zaifeng Gao ◽  
...  
Emotion ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 1446-1461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Guo ◽  
Wenmin Li ◽  
Xiqian Lu ◽  
Xiaodong Xu ◽  
Fangfang Qiu ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (18) ◽  
pp. 4357-4366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivia Gosseries ◽  
Qing Yu ◽  
Joshua J. LaRocque ◽  
Michael J. Starrett ◽  
Nathan S. Rose ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. e0186498
Author(s):  
Hannah Lee ◽  
Jejoong Kim

2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 1332-1345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mowei Shen ◽  
Zaifeng Gao ◽  
Xiaowei Ding ◽  
Bing Zhou ◽  
Xiang Huang

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Remington Mallett ◽  
Anurima Mummaneni ◽  
Jarrod Lewis-Peacock

Working memory persists in the face of distraction, yet not without consequence. Previous research has shown that memory for low-level visual features is systematically influenced by the maintenance or presentation of a similar distractor stimulus. Responses are frequently biased in stimulus space towards a perceptual distractor, though this has yet to be determined for high-level stimuli. We investigated whether these influences are shared for complex visual stimuli such as faces. To quantify response accuracies for these stimuli, we used a delayed-estimation task with a computer-generated “face space” consisting of eighty faces that varied continuously as a function of age and sex. In a set of three experiments, we found that responses for a target face held in working memory were biased towards a distractor face presented during the maintenance period. The amount of response bias did not vary as a function of distance between target and distractor. Our data suggest that, similar to low-level visual features, high-level face representations in working memory are biased by the processing of related but task-irrelevant information.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document