The validated circular shape space: Quantifying the visual similarity of shape.

Aedan Y. Li; Jackson C. Liang; Andy C. H. Lee; Morgan D. Barense

doi:10.1037/xge0000693

The validated circular shape space: Quantifying the visual similarity of shape.

Journal of Experimental Psychology General ◽

10.1037/xge0000693 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 149 (5) ◽

pp. 949-966 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Aedan Y. Li ◽

Jackson C. Liang ◽

Andy C. H. Lee ◽

Morgan D. Barense

Keyword(s):

Shape Space ◽

Visual Similarity ◽

Circular Shape

Download Full-text

Visual interference can help and hinder memory: Capturing representational detail using the Validated Circular Shape Space

10.1101/535922 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Aedan Y. Li ◽

Keisuke Fukuda ◽

Andy C. H. Lee ◽

Morgan D. Barense

Keyword(s):

Shape Space ◽

Angular Distance ◽

Visual Similarity ◽

Coarse Grained ◽

Retrieval Task ◽

Circular Shape ◽

Fine Grained ◽

Visual Interference ◽

Color Memory ◽

First Time

AbstractAlthough we can all agree that interference induces forgetting, there is surprisingly little consensus regarding what type of interference most likely disrupts memory. We previously proposed that the similarity of interference differentially impacts the representational detail of color memory. Here, we extend this work by applying the Validated Circular Shape Space (Li et al., 2020) for the first time to a continuous retrieval task, in which we quantified both the visual similarity of distracting information as well as the representational detail of shape memory. We found that the representational detail of memory was systematically and differentially altered by the similarity of distracting information. Dissimilar distractors disrupted both fine- and coarse-grained information about the target, akin to memory erasure. In contrast, similar distractors disrupted fine-grained target information but increased reliance on coarse-grained information about the target, akin to memory blurring. Notably, these effects were consistent across two mixture models that each implemented a different scaling metric (either angular distance or perceived target similarity), as well as a parameter-free analysis that did not fit the mixture model. These findings suggest that similar distractors will help memory in cases where coarse-grained information is sufficient to identify the target. In other cases where precise fine-grained information is needed to identify the target, similar distractors will impair memory. As these effects have now been observed across both stimulus domains of shape and color, and were robust across multiple scaling metrics and methods of analyses, we suggest that these results provide a general set of principles governing how the nature of interference impacts forgetting.

Download Full-text