scholarly journals Adaptive constructive processes: An episodic specificity induction impacts false recall in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm.

2019 ◽  
Vol 148 (9) ◽  
pp. 1480-1493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Preston P. Thakral ◽  
Kevin P. Madore ◽  
Aleea L. Devitt ◽  
Daniel L. Schacter
Keyword(s):  
False Recall

False Recall of to be Forgotten Information

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuh-Shiow Lee ◽  
Yi-Chiang Hsu
Keyword(s):  
False Recall

The Modality Effect on False Recall as a Function of Working Memory Span

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebekah E. Smith ◽  
Tabitha Payne ◽  
Randall W. Engle
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Memory Span ◽  
False Recall ◽  
Modality Effect

I Know the Theme, So I Don't Say It': The Role of Identifiability on False Recall

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Carneiro ◽  
Ana Rita Dias ◽  
Angel Fernandez
Keyword(s):  
False Recall

scholarly journals Young children produce categorical false recall without activation of the lure items

2014 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomohiro Nabeta ◽  
Sumino Wakabayashi ◽  
Shin-Young Park ◽  
Akiko Kamigaki ◽  
Akira Yamazaki
Keyword(s):  
Young Children ◽  
False Recall

scholarly journals Age differences in veridical and false recall are not inevitable: The role of frontal lobe function

2004 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 921-925 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin M. Butler ◽  
Mark A. Mcdaniel ◽  
Courtney C. Dornburg ◽  
Amanda L. Price ◽  
Henry L. Roediger
Keyword(s):  
Frontal Lobe ◽  
Age Differences ◽  
False Recall ◽  
Frontal Lobe Function

scholarly journals The role of phantom recollection in false recall

2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 902-917 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tammy A. Marche ◽  
C. J. Brainerd
Keyword(s):  
False Recall ◽  
Phantom Recollection

scholarly journals Study Modality and False Recall

2011 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebekah E. Smith ◽  
Randall W. Engle
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Resource Availability ◽  
Working Memory Capacity ◽  
Critical Item ◽  
False Memories ◽  
Memory Capacity ◽  
False Recall ◽  
Modality Effect ◽  
Study Phase ◽  
Study Modality

False memories occur when individuals mistakenly report an event as having taken place when that event did not in fact occur. The DRM ( Deese, 1959 ; Roediger & McDermott, 1995 ) paradigm provides an effective technique for creating and investigating false memories. In this paradigm participants study a list of words (e.g., SOUR, CANDY,…) that are highly associated to a non-presented critical item (e.g., SWEET). The study phase is followed by a test of memory for the study list words. Researchers typically find very high levels of false recall of the critical non-presented item. However, the likelihood of falsely remembering the non-presented critical items can be reduced by presenting studied associates visually rather than auditorally (e.g., Smith & Hunt, 1998 ). This is referred to as the modality effect in false memory. The current study investigated the role of resource availability in the expression of this modality effect in false recall. In Experiment 1 false recall was reduced in the visual study presentation condition relative to the auditory condition for participants with higher working memory capacity, but not for participants with lower working memory capacity. In Experiment 2 the effect of study modality on false recall was eliminated by the addition of a divided attention task at encoding. Both studies support the proposal that resource availability plays a role in the expression of the modality effect in the DRM paradigm ( Smith, Lozito, & Bayen, 2005 ).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document