The Antisemitism-Related Stress Inventory: Development and preliminary psychometric evaluation.

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 726-734
Author(s):  
Daniel C. Rosen ◽  
Adam M. Kuczynski ◽  
Jonathan W. Kanter
1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai-Kuen Leung ◽  
Bee-Horng Lue ◽  
Li-Yu Tang ◽  
En-Chang Wu

1994 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 515-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gireesh V. Gupchup ◽  
Alan P. Wolfgang

Scores from a sample of pharmacists on the Health Professions Stress Inventory were factor analyzed to identify any underlying components of these professionals' job-related stress. Data were collected via mail questionnaires from a nationwide sample of 573 practicing pharmacists. Three- and four-factor solutions, using both orthogonal and oblique rotations, were compared. Based on these comparisons, a four-factor oblique solution was judged to be most appropriate, the four factors being labeled Professional Recognition, Patient Care Responsibilities, Job Conflicts, and Professional Uncertainty. The factors show evidence of internal consistency and construct validity.


Assessment ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Miller ◽  
Jungeun Kim ◽  
Grace A. Chen ◽  
Alvin N. Alvarez

The authors conducted exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of the Asian American Racism-Related Stress Inventory (AARRSI) to further examine the underlying factor structure in a total sample of 1,273 Asian American participants. In the first step of analysis, an exploratory factor analysis with 651 participants yielded a 13-item two-factor solution to the data. In the second step, a confirmatory factor analysis with 622 participants supported both the 13-item two-factor model and the original 29-item three-factor model in the cross-validation sample and generational and ethnicity analyses. The two-factor and three-factor models produced internal consistency estimates ranging from .81 to .95. In addition, the authors examined convergent and criterion related evidence for 13-item and 29-item versions of the AARRSI. Given its brief nature and generally good fit across generational status and ethnicity, the authors suggest that the 13-item AARRSI might be advantageous for research and assessment endeavors.


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-61
Author(s):  
Chiuchu Chuang ◽  
◽  
Ki Byung Chae ◽  
Jiang-miao Wu ◽  
Seana Pernice-Kowalcyzk

2002 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 142-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Maree Polimeni ◽  
Elizabeth Hardie ◽  
Simone Buzwell

This study developed a psychometrically sound measure of closeness in Australian men's ( n = 59) and women's ( n = 77) same-sex friendships, the Friendship Closeness Inventory. Subscales were developed to measure both masculine and feminine styles of closeness in three domains of Emotional Closeness, Behavioural Closeness, and Cognitive Closeness. The inventory was subjected to reliability checks which supported the reliability of each scale, and factor analyses which supported the 3-factor design. Correlations among ratings on subscales suggested that the affective, behavioural, and cognitive dimensions are distinguishable but related components of friendship. Group comparisons indicated that women rated themselves closer to their same-sex friends on the affective dimension than men. Researchers have suggested that sex-role socialisation may partly account for sex differences in self-ratings of emotional expressiveness in friendships. There were no significant differences between men's and women's ratings on the behavioural and cognitive aspects of friendships. The cognitive element may need further exploration in further scale development as it measures only one aspect of cognitive closeness: the perceived influence of friends. Pending further validation, the inventory appears potentially useful for research exploring affective, behavioural, and cognitive elements of young men's and women's friendships.


2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher T. H. Christopher T. H. Liang ◽  
Lisa C. Li ◽  
Bryan S. K. Kim

1999 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 557-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai-Kuen Leung ◽  
Bee-Horng Lue ◽  
Li-Yu Tang ◽  
En-Chang Wu

1987 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillip J. Brantley ◽  
Craig D. Waggoner ◽  
Glenn N. Jones ◽  
Neil B. Rappaport

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document