A systematic review of community stakeholder involvement during application of the ADAPT-ITT model to adapt trauma interventions for new populations.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Courtenay E. Cavanaugh ◽  
Angela Wismar
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Stakeholder Involvement ◽  
Community Stakeholder

scholarly journals Development of the ACTIVE framework to describe stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 245-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Pollock ◽  
Pauline Campbell ◽  
Caroline Struthers ◽  
Anneliese Synnot ◽  
Jack Nunn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Public Involvement ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Stakeholder Involvement ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Literature Searching ◽  
Health Decision

Objectives Involvement of patients, health professionals, and the wider public (‘stakeholders’) is seen to be beneficial to the quality, relevance and impact of research and may enhance the usefulness and uptake of systematic reviews. However, there is a lack of evidence and resources to guide researchers in how to actively involve stakeholders in systematic reviews. In this paper, we report the development of the ACTIVE framework to describe how stakeholders are involved in systematic reviews. Methods We developed a framework using methods previously described in the development of conceptual frameworks relating to other areas of public involvement, including: literature searching, data extraction, analysis, and categorization. A draft ACTIVE framework was developed and then refined after presentation at a conference workshop, before being applied to a subset of 32 systematic reviews. Data extracted from these systematic reviews, identified in a systematic scoping review, were categorized against pre-defined constructs, including: who was involved, how stakeholders were recruited, the mode of involvement, at what stage there was involvement and the level of control or influence. Results The final ACTIVE framework described whether patients, carers and/or families, and/or other stakeholders (including health professionals, health decision makers and funders) were involved. We defined: recruitment as either open or closed; the approach to involvement as either one-time, continuous or combined; and the method of involvement as either direct or indirect. The stage of involvement in reviews was defined using the Cochrane Ecosystem stages of a review. The level of control or influence was defined according to the roles and activities of stakeholders in the review process, and described as the ACTIVE continuum of involvement. Conclusions The ACTIVE framework provides a structure with which to describe key components of stakeholder involvement within a systematic review, and we have used this to summarize how stakeholders have been involved in a subset of varied systematic reviews. The ACTIVE continuum of involvement provides a new model that uses tasks and roles to detail the level of stakeholder involvement. This work has contributed to the development of learning resources aimed at supporting systematic review authors and editors to involve stakeholders in their systematic reviews. The ACTIVE framework may support the decision-making of systematic review authors in planning how to involve stakeholders in future reviews.

scholarly journals Management of asthma exacerbations in the paediatric population: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (161) ◽  
pp. 200367
Author(s):  
Sara Manti ◽  
Amelia Licari ◽  
Salvatore Leonardi ◽  
Gian Luigi Marseglia
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Asthma Exacerbation ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Stakeholder Involvement ◽  
Paediatric Population ◽  
International Standards ◽  
Asthma Exacerbations ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Primary Healthcare Providers

BackgroundAsthma exacerbations in children is one of the most common medical conditions requiring urgent visits to primary healthcare providers or emergency departments, and even hospitalisations. Currently, there is significant variation in the management of asthma exacerbations expressed in guideline recommendations versus clinical practice. This disconnect affects diagnostic and treatment decisions for the clinician and patient.ObjectiveWe systematically reviewed the available guidelines providing recommendations for diagnostic and therapeutic management of asthma exacerbations in the paediatric population.MethodsA systematic review of the literature for guidelines published between January 2009 and October 2019 was conducted, using a protocol registered with the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO CRD42020221562).Results16 asthma exacerbation clinical practice guidelines for children were included. Despite general agreement between guidelines on the definition of asthma exacerbation, there was great variability in the definition of disease severity and assessment of asthma control. This systematic review also highlighted a paucity of recommendations for criteria for hospitalisation and discharge. Many guidelines scored poorly when measured for stakeholder involvement and editorial independence.ConclusionComprehensive and updated guidelines compliant with international standards for clinical guidelines may significantly improve clinical practice quality, promote evidence-based recommendations and provide uniformity of treatment between countries.

New success factors for construction projects: a systematic review of post-2004 literature

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shawn H. Charles ◽  
Alice Chang-Richards ◽  
(Kenneth) Tak Wing Yiu
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Conceptual Framework ◽  
Construction Projects ◽  
Success Factors ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Project Success ◽  
Stakeholder Involvement ◽  
Success Factor ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Project Objectives

Purpose The purpose of this study is to elicit the success factors from empirical evidence, as construction industry requires an improved understanding of factors for managing projects to positive outcomes. Increased stakeholder involvement, including the new technologies, achieving sustainability and safeguarding health and safety, whilst at the same time facing uncertainties, it is crucial to examine whether there are new factors that drive construction projects to succeed, especially from a value-driven perspective. Design/methodology/approach Using a systematic review approach, this research reviewed 172 studies published after 2004. When compared to a comprehensive project success factor framework presented by Chan et al. in 2004, 19 factors are considered new since 2004. Findings Though several scholarly outputs highlighted significant improvements to project operations and innovations in equipment and techniques, there has not been a comprehensive oversight since Chan’s et al. (2004) conceptual framework. This paper investigates 16 years of industry changes and identified two new success factors categories (innovation and sustainability) and 19 new factors that add to Chan’s et al. (2004) study. Consequently, a new framework of factors affecting project success was developed. Originality/value This paper was very specific in its attempt to find the new and additional success factors for managing construction projects. A new conceptual framework, which includes the newly identified factors, was then developed that will create a greater awareness of stakeholders’ concerns and ultimately contribute to significant improvement in developing project objectives and defining success measures.

A systematic review of stakeholder involvement in social marketing interventions

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nuray Buyucek ◽  
Krzysztof Kubacki ◽  
Sharyn Rundle-Thiele ◽  
Bo Pang
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Social Marketing ◽  
Stakeholder Involvement

scholarly journals Evaluation of quality indicators for management of the National School Feeding Program in Brazil: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 3099-3110
Author(s):  
Daniela Bicalho ◽  
Thanise Sabrina Souza Santos ◽  
Betzabeth Slater ◽  
Tácio Mendonça Lima
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Quality Indicators ◽  
Organizational Context ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Stakeholder Involvement ◽  
Evaluation Instrument ◽  
School Feeding ◽  
National School ◽  
Feeding Program ◽  
School Feeding Program

Abstract This article aims to identify studies that developed quality indicator for the management of the National School Feeding Program (PNAE, in Brazilian context) and to critically appraise the properties of their instruments. Systematic review using Scopus, Lilacs, Pubmed and Web of Science for data collection. The search was limited to studies between 2009 and 2019. The search strategy included search terms related to school feeding, program evaluation, and indicator. The indicators were evaluated using the Appraisal of Indicators through Research and Evaluation instrument. The search identified 1,355 studies, of which 14 were potentially relevant records and 10 met the inclusion criteria. Most studies used a literature review with consensus techniques in the development of the instrument and a frame work format to evaluate the PNAE. None of them presented evidence of validity of the instrument. The highest level was achieved on the domain ‘Purpose, relevance and organizational context’, followed by ‘Stakeholder involvement’, ‘Additional evidence, formulation and usage’, and ‘Scientific evidence’. This review found gaps in the methodology of studies that had developed quality indicators for the management of PNAE. Future development of these instruments should include validity evidence.

scholarly journals Towards high-quality, useful practice guidelines for child and youth mental health disorders: protocol for a systematic review and consensus exercise

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e018053 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn Bennett ◽  
Stephanie Duda ◽  
Melissa Brouwers ◽  
Peter Szatmari ◽  
Amanda Newton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Practice Guidelines ◽  
Stakeholder Involvement ◽  
Youth Mental Health ◽  
Nominal Group ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Agree Ii ◽  
Oppositional Defiant ◽  
Group Methods

IntroductionThe quality of clinical practice guidelines (PGs) has not been evaluated in child and youth mental health (CYMH). To address this gap, we will: (1) conduct a systematic review (SR) to answer the question ‘among eligible PGs relevant to the prevention or treatment of CYMH conditions, which PGs meet criteria for minimum and high quality?’; (2) apply nominal group methods to create recommendations for how CYMH PG quality, completeness and usefulness can be strengthened.Methods and analysisSR: Potentially eligible PGs will be identified in 12 databases using a reproducible search strategy developed by a research librarian. Trained raters will: (1) apply prespecified criteria to identify eligible PGs relevant to depression, anxiety, suicidality, bipolar disorder, behaviour disorder (attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder) and substance use disorder; (2) extract descriptive data and (3) assess PG quality using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) tool. Scores on three AGREE II domains (rigour of development, stakeholder involvement, editorial independence) will designate PGs as minimum (≥50%) or high quality (≥70%). Nominal group: Four CYMH PG knowledge user groups (clinicians, mental health service planners, youth and adult family members) will participate in structured exercises derived using nominal group methods to generate recommendations to improve PG quality, completeness and usefulness.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval is not required. Study products will be disseminated as follows. A cross-platform website will house eligible CYMH PGs and their quality ratings. Twitter and Facebook tools will promote it to a wide variety of PG users. Data from Google Analytics, Twitonomy and Altmetrics will inform usage evaluation. Complementary educational workshops will be conducted for CYMH professionals. Print materials and journal articles will be produced.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42017060738.

scholarly journals Stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews: a protocol for a systematic review of methods, outcomes and effects

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Pollock ◽  
Pauline Campbell ◽  
Caroline Struthers ◽  
Anneliese Synnot ◽  
Jack Nunn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Stakeholder Involvement

Ecosystem-based solutions for gravitational natural hazard mitigation: a review on the use of protection forests for disaster risk reduction in mountain areas

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Cocuccioni ◽  
Francesca Poratelli ◽  
Cristian Accastello ◽  
Stefan Steger ◽  
Stefan Schneiderbauer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Risk Reduction ◽  
Natural Hazards ◽  
Disaster Risk Reduction ◽  
Natural Hazard ◽  
Stakeholder Involvement ◽  
Disaster Risk ◽  
Mountain Regions ◽  
Mountain Areas ◽  
Natural Hazard Mitigation

<p>Mountain regions are affected by various natural hazards, of which gravitational mass movements are some of the most important ones. Due to the accumulation of settlements and intense economic activities in exposed areas, mountain regions such as the Alps constitute a risk hot-spot. The threat posed by gravitational natural hazards to human activities affirms the strong need for risk management, particularly for prevention. Structural measures are increasingly applied in combination with land use planning and ecosystem-based solutions. In particular, ecosystem-based solutions not only prevent the initiation of the processes but also act as a protective barrier. These green measures have been gaining an increasing attention also due to their adaptability to respond to the challenges posed by global change. Systematic reviews on how ecosystems can be used for disaster risk reduction have been carried out; however, their focus is on urban and coastal environments or on specific natural hazards such as shallow landslides. Up to now, there is no systematic review which addresses the role of ecosystems in disaster risk reduction regarding multiple gravitational natural hazards in mountain areas.</p><p>This contribution provides such a systematic review aimed at filling this knowledge gap to give a direction for future research. The review is composed of two main parts: a quantitative bibliometric analysis followed by a qualitative review. The quantitative part, based on the Scopus peer-reviewed database, aimed to investigate the publication trend on the ecosystem-based solutions for gravitational natural hazard mitigation by comparing it with the general trend of published scientific documents. The bibliometric analysis also served as a basis to select most relevant articles on which to conduct the subsequent qualitative analysis. The content of the so selected publications was analysed qualitatively the following  predefined criteria: the natural hazards addressed, the features of the ecosystem (i.e. forest species composition, management activities, effectiveness in risk mitigation), the development of alternative scenarios to test different hypothesis, the degree of stakeholder involvement, and the monetary evaluation of the measures (i.e. comparing them to structural measures). Results show a sharp increase in the number of publications on the topic from 1980 to 2018 compared to the overall number of documents published on Scopus. Although the overall topic is gaining more attention in scientific literature, the in-depth qualitative analysis revealed that research still pays little attention to stakeholder involvement and an economic evaluation of measures. We conclude that filling this research gap might help to foster a wider adoption of ecosystem-based solutions for disaster risk reduction across mountain areas.</p>

The effects of low-ratio n-6/n-3 PUFA on biomarkers of inflammation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yali Wei ◽  
Yan Meng ◽  
Na Li ◽  
Qian Wang ◽  
Liyong Chen
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Fatty Acid ◽  
Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Chain Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid ◽  
Inflammation Markers ◽  
Pufa Supplementation ◽  
Long Chain

The purpose of the systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine if low-ratio n-6/n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) supplementation affects serum inflammation markers based on current studies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document