scholarly journals Impression formation from video conference screenshots: The role of gaze, camera distance, and angle.

2022 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Géraldine Fauville ◽  
Anna C. M. Queiroz ◽  
Mufan Luo ◽  
Jeffrey Hancock ◽  
Jeremy N. Bailenson
Keyword(s):  
Impression Formation ◽  
Video Conference

Forming Impressions of Personality

2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 153-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanne Nauts ◽  
Oliver Langner ◽  
Inge Huijsmans ◽  
Roos Vonk ◽  
Daniël H. J. Wigboldus
Keyword(s):  
Impression Formation ◽  
Context Dependent

Asch’s seminal research on “Forming Impressions of Personality” (1946) has widely been cited as providing evidence for a primacy-of-warmth effect, suggesting that warmth-related judgments have a stronger influence on impressions of personality than competence-related judgments (e.g., Fiske, Cuddy, & Glick, 2007 ; Wojciszke, 2005 ). Because this effect does not fit with Asch’s Gestalt-view on impression formation and does not readily follow from the data presented in his original paper, the goal of the present study was to critically examine and replicate the studies of Asch’s paper that are most relevant to the primacy-of-warmth effect. We found no evidence for a primacy-of-warmth effect. Instead, the role of warmth was highly context-dependent, and competence was at least as important in shaping impressions as warmth.

Cognitive busyness and impression formation: The moderating role of ingroup identification

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie Hall ◽  
Richard Crisp ◽  
Ifat Rauf ◽  
Terry Eskenazi-Behar ◽  
Russell Hutter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Impression Formation ◽  
Cognitive Busyness ◽  
Ingroup Identification ◽  
Moderating Role

scholarly journals The role of morality in social cognition

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Lauren Ray ◽  
Peter Mende-Siedlecki ◽  
Ana P. Gantman ◽  
Jay Joseph Van Bavel
Keyword(s):  
Social Cognition ◽  
Social Perception ◽  
Impression Formation ◽  
Factor Models ◽  
The Other ◽  
One Dimension ◽  
Primary Role ◽  
The Past ◽  
Important Basis

Over the past few decades, two-factor models of social cognition have emerged as the dominant framework for understanding impression formation. Despite the differences in the labels, there is wide agreement that one dimension reflects sociability potential, and the other, competence. One way in which the various two-factor models do clearly differ, however, is in the way the dimensions incorporate or produce evaluations of morality. Aristotle saw morality as the most important basis on which to form positive evaluations, because competence and sociability could only be virtuous, sincere, and trustworthy if expressed through a moral character. This chapter highlights research demonstrating the unique and possibly primary role of morality in social cognition. We clarify the dynamic, interactive, and conjoint effects of morality on social perception, and argue morality, competence, and sociability are three influential and interactive dimensions of social perception.

Role of Housekeeping in Impression Formation Measure

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul B. Harris ◽  
Daniel Sachau
Keyword(s):  
Impression Formation

Impression formation: The role of expressive behavior.

1986 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 421-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald E. Riggio ◽  
Howard S. Friedman
Keyword(s):  
Impression Formation ◽  
Expressive Behavior

A cognitive approach to characterization: Katherina in Shakespeare’s The Taming of the Shrew

2000 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 291-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Culpeper
Keyword(s):  
Social Cognition ◽  
Prior Knowledge ◽  
Impression Formation ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Schema Theory ◽  
Cognitive Approach ◽  
Textual Evidence ◽  
Cognitive Theories

In this article, I argue that literary characterization can be fruitfully approached by drawing upon theories developed within social cognition to explain the perception of real-life people. I demonstrate how this approach can explain the construction of Katherina, the protagonist in Shakespeare’s The Taming of the Shrew. Specifically, I introduce notions from cognitive theories of knowledge (especially schema theory), and impression formation. Using these, I describe (1) the role of prior knowledge in forming an impression of a character, and (2) how various types of impression are formed. Prior to my analysis of Katherina, I outline the kind of shrew schema the Elizabethans might have had knowledge of. Then, in my analysis I argue that the textual evidence in the first part of the play is largely consistent with this schema, and thus Katherina at this stage is largely a schema-based character. However, I show that as the play progresses a number of changes create the conditions for a more complex and personalized character. As a consequence of this analysis, I claim that Katherina is not, as some critics have argued, simply a shrew, or an inconsistent character, or a typical character of a farce.

The Effects of Depression on Impression Formation: The Role of Trait and Category Diagnosticity

2000 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 462-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A. Edwards ◽  
Gifford Weary ◽  
William von Hippel ◽  
Jill A. Jacobson
Keyword(s):  
Impression Formation
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document