Adapting the Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire for measuring repetitive negative thinking in clinical psychology trainees.

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iduar Dereix-Calonge ◽  
Francisco J. Ruiz ◽  
Juan C. Suárez-Falcón ◽  
Cindy L. Flórez
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Psychology ◽  
Repetitive Negative Thinking ◽  
Psychology Trainees ◽  
Negative Thinking ◽  
Clinical Psychology Trainees ◽  
Perseverative Thinking

Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire-–Clinical Psychology Trainees

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iduar Dereix-Calonge ◽  
Francisco J. Ruiz ◽  
Juan C. Suárez-Falcón ◽  
Cindy L. Flórez
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Psychology ◽  
Psychology Trainees ◽  
Clinical Psychology Trainees ◽  
Perseverative Thinking

A Novel Measure of Real-Time Perseverative Thought

2021 ◽  
pp. 216770262110380
Author(s):  
Elizabeth C. Wade ◽  
Rivka T. Cohen ◽  
Paddy Loftus ◽  
Ayelet Meron Ruscio
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Status ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Repetitive Negative Thinking ◽  
Negative Thinking ◽  
New Methods ◽  
Temporal Process ◽  
Stimulus Valence ◽  
Ambiguous Stimuli ◽  
Perseverative Thinking ◽  
Positive Stimuli

Perseverative thinking (PT), or repetitive negative thinking, has historically been measured using global self-report scales. New methods of assessment are needed to advance understanding of this inherently temporal process. We developed an intensive longitudinal method for assessing PT. A mixed sample of 77 individuals ranging widely in trait PT, including persons with PT-related disorders (generalized anxiety disorder, major depression) and persons without psychopathology, used a joystick to provide continuous ratings of thought valence and intensity following exposure to scenarios of differing valence. Joystick responses were robustly predicted by trait PT, clinical status, and stimulus valence. Higher trait perseverators exhibited more extreme joystick values overall, greater stability in values following threatening and ambiguous stimuli, weaker stability in values following positive stimuli, and greater inertia in values following ambiguous stimuli. The joystick method is a promising measure with the potential to shed new light on the dynamics and precipitants of perseverative thinking.

scholarly journals Validation of the Child-version of the Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire of repetitive negative thinking in young people with diagnosed depressive and anxiety disorders

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitlin Hitchcock ◽  
Renee Brown ◽  
Vanessa E. Cobham
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Young People ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Depressive Disorders ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Repetitive Negative Thinking ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analyses ◽  
Negative Thinking ◽  
Perseverative Thinking

This paper sought to provide the first validation of a transdiagnostic measure of repetitive negative thinking – the Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire- Child version (PTQ-C) – in young people diagnosed with anxiety and depressive disorders. Participants (N=114) were 11-17 year-olds with complex and comorbid presentations seeking treatment through Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services. Confirmatory factor analyses best supported a three-factor model for the PTQ-C, however, hypotheses of both perfect and close fit were rejected. Results demonstrated good internal consistency, convergent validity and divergent validity for the three PTQ-S subscales; core characteristics, perceived unproductiveness and consumed mental capacity of negative repetitive thinking. PTQ-C scores did not account for additional variance in anxiety symptoms once worry was considered, indicating that retention of a content specific measure may be warranted in clinical samples. Findings suggest that PTQ-C subscales not total scores should be used with clinical samples, and emphasise the importance of validating clinically relevant measures which were developed with subclinical populations in samples with diagnosed mental health disorders.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document