A future for indigenous psychology of spirituality?

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alvin Dueck ◽  
Michael Marossy
Keyword(s):  
Indigenous Psychology ◽  
Psychology Of Spirituality

The concept of good leader among urban people in Jakarta: An indigenous psychology analysis

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Handrix Chrisharyanto ◽  
Tia Rahmania ◽  
Fatchiah E. Kertamuda
Keyword(s):  
Indigenous Psychology ◽  
Urban People ◽  
Good Leader

Psikologi Ulayat

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarlito Wirawan Sarwono
Keyword(s):  
Indigenous Psychology ◽  
Bahasa Indonesia

<p>Psikologi klasik cenderung konservatif, yang lebih banyak berurusan dengan teori teori tentang proses-proses individual dan yang bersifat universal. Kecenderungan kepada paradigma sosial, berawal ketika psikolog-psikolog Eropa, Serge<br />Moscovici meluncurkan gagasannya tentang reprentasi sosial (1961) dan Henrri Tajfel dan Turner mempublikasikan teori mereka tentang identitas social (1979). Psikologi tidak lagi semata-mata individual, namun terkait dengan lingkungan sosial dan kebudayaan. Setiap kelompok, ras atau etnik, jadinya punya psikologinya sendiri yang relevan dengan konteks kehidupan masingmasing. Di tahun 1933 seorang psikolog Asia, Uichol Kim dan sejawatnya orang Eropa, John Berry mencetuskan istilah indigenous psychology yang didefi niskannya sebagai “studi ilmiah tentang perilaku dan minda (mind) manusia yang berasal dari dirinya sendiri (native), yang tidak dibawa dari daerah lain, dan dirancang untuk orang-orang itu sendiri”. Karena tidak ada padanan dalam bahasa Indonesia untuk kata “indigenous”, maka dalam sebuah Konges Ikatan Psikologi Sosial di Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, pada tahun 1999, saya mencetuskan kata “ulayat”. Saya meminjam istilah itu dari antropologi dan hukum</p><p>Kata kunci:. Psikologi sosial, psikologi budaya, psikologi Asia, psikologi ulayat</p>

Way to capture theory of indigenous psychology

2010 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 96-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwang-Kuo Hwang
Keyword(s):  
Indigenous Psychology ◽  
Capture Theory

scholarly journals Making the Most of Culture and Context

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 160940691879843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liesel Ebersöhn ◽  
Marlize Malan-Van Rooyen
Keyword(s):  
Young People ◽  
Indigenous Research ◽  
Participatory Methods ◽  
Visual Data ◽  
Indigenous Psychology ◽  
Elicitation Methods ◽  
Sociocultural Perspectives ◽  
Gender And Age ◽  
Border Communities ◽  
Contextual Characteristics

Research aimed at generating evidence to address elicitation challenges that arise because of extreme inequality and marginalized perspectives requires deliberation on relevant methodologies that can elicit insights by both revering marginalized sociocultural strengths and being sensitive to power imbalances. In this article, we provide examples of participatory methods that make the most of often silenced non-Western sociocultural strengths and create opportunities for participation despite barriers due to inequality. The examples emerged from multiple researcher journals and visual data from a study that documented indigenous psychology on resilience with elders ( n = 24; male = 10, female = 14) and young people ( n = 48; male = 21, female = 27) in two remote Southern African border communities. We describe the examples of elicitation methods to make the most of culture using (i) symbols that reflect nonmainstream sociocultural perspectives, (ii) familiar multiliteracies, (iii) a variety of spoken languages, and (iv) familiar collectivist modes, as well as contextual characteristics to (i) equalize opportunity given structural disparity, (ii) equalize power, and (iii) honor gender and age hierarchies. We conclude that methods for indigenous research can honor and leverage marginalized cultures and contexts to extend beyond sympathy for an oppressed worldview or a context of deprivation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document