Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale--Second Edition; Mandarin Chinese Version

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen C. Zhang ◽  
Hengfen Gong ◽  
Yingying Zhang ◽  
Haiyan Jin ◽  
Yong Yang ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Eric B. Lee ◽  
Chen Cheng Zhang ◽  
Hengfen Gong ◽  
Yingying Zhang ◽  
Haiyan Jin ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 84 (Supplement A) ◽  
pp. 34-47
Author(s):  
Hengfen Gong ◽  
Tessa M. H. Nederpel ◽  
Guozhen Lin ◽  
Yingying Zhang ◽  
Yong Yang ◽  
...  

The aim of this study is to replicate the findings from previous research about the psychometric properties of the Mandarin Chinese version of the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory–Revised (OCI-R), which assesses the presence of symptoms obsessive-compulsive disorder and the distress associated with those symptoms. The final clinical sample included 80 participants from multiple psychiatric outpatient clinics in China. Participants completed the following questionnaires: the OCI-R, the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21), the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale–II (Y-BOCS-II), and the Clinical Global Impressions Scale, Severity (CGI-S). The Mandarin Chinese version of the OCI-R demonstrated good internal consistency for the total scale and each subscale. Good convergent and divergent validity was established. The Mandarin Chinese version of the OCI-R demonstrated good psychometric properties. Further research is needed to examine the factor structure of the Chinese version of the OCI-R and the extent to which it aligns with the original version.


2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 494-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen C. Zhang ◽  
Hengfen Gong ◽  
Yingying Zhang ◽  
Haiyan Jin ◽  
Yong Yang ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yiting Emily Guo ◽  
Leanne Togher ◽  
Emma Power ◽  
Rob Heard

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
pp. 3267-3275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiang Sun ◽  
Carrie Allison ◽  
Bonnie Auyeung ◽  
Fiona E. Matthews ◽  
Simon Baron-Cohen ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Chen Hung ◽  
Chun-Yi Lin ◽  
Li-Chiun Tsai ◽  
Ya-Jung Lee

2003 ◽  
Vol 112 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pa-Chun Wang ◽  
Chia-Chen Chu ◽  
Chih-Jaan Tai ◽  
Shu-Cheng Liang ◽  
Richard E. Gliklich

The Chronic Ear Survey (CES) is a valid, disease-specific measure for the evaluation of health status and treatment effectiveness for adults with chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM). This study compares the validation properties of the English and Chinese versions of the CES. The CES was translated into Mandarin Chinese by means of a parallel model. The Chinese version of the CES (CCES) was administered to 103 patients in a prospective manner, then was validated according to established criteria for reliability, validity, and longitudinal sensitivity. The CCES demonstrated good test-retest reliability and internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.81). The CCES significantly correlated with the Mandarin Chinese (Taiwan) version of the generic 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (TSF-36). The standardized response mean for the CCES total score was 2.1, indicating excellent sensitivity to clinical change. This validation study demonstrated that the performance characteristics of the CCES were equivalent to those of the English-version CES. The CCES is a valid tool for evaluation of adults with CSOM among the Chinese-speaking population.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document