Relationships between religious characteristics and response to legal action against parents who choose faith healing practices for their children.

Limitations of action designate extent of time after an event, as set by statutes of limitations, within which legal action can be initiated by a party to a transaction. No event is actionable outside the designated time as same is rendered statute-barred. This study aims to provide an insight into application and significance of Limitations Act 1950 and Limitation Ordinance 1952 to Islamic banking matters in Malaysia as well as Shariah viewpoint on the issue of limitation of action. In conducting the study, a qualitative research methodology is employed where reported Islamic banking cases from 1983 to 2018 in Malaysia were reviewed and analysed to ascertain the application of those statutes of limitations to Islamic banking. Likewise, relevant provisions of the statutes as invoked in the cases were examined to determine possible legislative conflicts between the provisions and the rule of Islamic law in governing the right and limitation of action in Islamic banking cases under the law. The reviewed cases show the extent to which statutes of limitations were invoked in Malaysian courts in determining validity of Islamic banking matters. The limitation provisions so referred to are largely sections 6(1)(a) and 21(1) Limitations Act 1953 and section 19 Limitation Ordinance 1953, which do not conflict with Shariah viewpoint on the matter. This study will prove invaluable to financial institutions and their customers alike in promoting knowledge and creating awareness over actionable event in the course of their transactions.

Download Full-text

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM WAJIB PAJAK TERHADAP SURAT KEPUTUSAN KEBERATAN DALAM SENGKETA PAJAK

JURNAL MEDIA HUKUM DAN PERADILAN ◽

10.29062/jmhp.v4i2.10 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 4 (2) ◽

pp. 153-165

Author(s):

Nadia Permata Ekasari Bisinglasi

Keyword(s):

Final Decision ◽

Legal Action ◽

The Law ◽

Tax Court

The effect of the law on the appeal by the taxpayer is by the issuance of the Decree of Objection, if in the Decree of Objection the taxpayer also still feel not satisfied then based on Laws of General Provisions of Taxation or UU KUP, the taxpayer is entitled to file the appeal back to the Tax Court. The legal effort of the taxpayer to seek justice becomes disconnected with the provisions of Article 33 paragraph (1) and Article 77 paragraph (1) of Law no. 14 year 2002 stating that the decision of the Tax Court is the final decision in examining and resolving tax disputes, so that no appeal or cassation can be appealed. This resulted in reduced taxpayers' right to seek justice. Allowable legal action is to conduct a Review, and this effort is extraordinary

Download Full-text

Analysis and outcomes of wrong site thyroid surgery

BMC Surgery ◽

10.1186/s12893-021-01247-7 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Gianlorenzo Dionigi ◽

Marco Raffaelli ◽

Rocco Bellantone ◽

Carmela De Crea ◽

Carlo Enrico Ambrosini ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Thyroid Surgery ◽

Rare Event ◽

Lymph Node Excision ◽

Legal Action ◽

Preventive Strategies ◽

Case Presentation ◽

Wrong Site Surgery ◽

Wrong Side ◽

Low Volume ◽

Wrong Site

Abstract Background In thyroid surgery, wrong-site surgery (WSS) is considered a rare event and seldom reported in the literature. Case presentation This report presents 5 WSS cases following thyroid surgery in a 20-year period. We stratified the subtypes of WSS in wrong target, wrong side, wrong procedure and wrong patient. Only planned and elective thyroid surgeries present WSS cases. The interventions were performed in low-volume hospitals, and subsequently, the patients were referred to our centres. Four cases of wrong-target procedures (thymectomies [n = 3] and lymph node excision [n = 1] performed instead of thyroidectomies) and one case of wrong-side procedure were observed in this study. Two wrong target cases resulting additionally in wrong procedure were noted. Wrong patient cases were not detected in the review. Patients experienced benign, malignant, or suspicious pathology and underwent traditional surgery (no endoscopic or robotic surgery). 40% of WSS led to legal action against the surgeon or a monetary settlement. Conclusion WSS is also observed in thyroid surgery. Considering that reports regarding the serious complications of WSS are not yet available, these complications should be discussed with the surgical community. Etiologic causes, outcomes, preventive strategies of WSS and expert opinion are presented.

Download Full-text