Client preference accommodation for religious/spiritual integration and psychotherapy outcomes in naturalistic practice settings.

Psychotherapy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua K. Swift ◽  
Megan O. Bird ◽  
Elizabeth A. Penix ◽  
Wilson T. Trusty
Keyword(s):  
Psychotherapy Outcomes ◽  
Spiritual Integration ◽  
Client Preference

Preferences

2019 ◽  
pp. 157-187
Author(s):  
Joshua K. Swift ◽  
Jennifer L. Callahan ◽  
Mick Cooper ◽  
Susannah R. Parkin
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Psychotherapy Outcomes ◽  
Case Examples ◽  
Practice Recommendations ◽  
Client Preference ◽  
Positive Treatment

Client preferences in psychotherapy reflect specific conditions and activities that clients desire in their treatment, with increasing evidence pointing to preference accommodation as facilitating psychotherapy outcomes. This updated meta-analysis establishes the magnitude of the effect of client preference accommodation in psychotherapy. Based on data from 53 studies and over 16,000 clients, preference accommodation was associated with fewer treatment dropouts (odds ratio = 1.79) and more positive treatment outcomes (d = .28). The chapter provides case examples of preference accommodation, limitations of the research, diversity considerations, and practice recommendations for working with client preferences.

Bridging Quantitative and Qualitative Gaps: A Process Look at Exceptional Psychotherapy Outcomes

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Okiishi ◽  
Mich Suyama ◽  
Michael Buxton ◽  
Melissa Jones ◽  
David W. Smart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psychotherapy Outcomes

Hope and Treatment Expectancies in Relation to Adolescent Psychotherapy Outcomes

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristy A. Ludwig ◽  
Jared S. Warren ◽  
Marc Porritt ◽  
Sasha Mondragon
Keyword(s):  
Psychotherapy Outcomes ◽  
Adolescent Psychotherapy ◽  
Treatment Expectancies

Using Labels: A Study of Client Preference

1990 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. 218-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Abaglo ◽  
J. Downing
Keyword(s):  
Visual Impairment ◽  
Visual Impairments ◽  
Handicapped Person ◽  
Significant Preference ◽  
Client Preference ◽  
Adolescents And Adults ◽  
Visually Handicapped

Fifty-one adolescents and adults with a variety of visual impairments were interviewed to determine their preference for different labels used to describe them. Participants were asked to choose among labels that state the disability before the person (“the visually handicapped person”) and labels that state the person before the disability (“the person with a visual impairment”). Results showed no statistically significant preference. Reasons provided by participants for their preference were characterized and presented thematically. The importance of stressing abilities and needs to be treated as normal were the most common reasons given by the participants for their selections. Participants who chose the person-first labels cited these reasons more often than those who chose the disability-first labels.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document