“Is Martin Luther King or Malcolm X the more acceptable face of protest? High-status groups’ reactions to low-status groups’ collective action”: Correction to Teixeira, Spears, and Yzerbyt (2019).

2020 ◽  
Vol 118 (5) ◽  
pp. 944-944
Keyword(s):  
Collective Action ◽  
Martin Luther ◽  
High Status ◽  
Malcolm X ◽  
Martin Luther King

Does the Movement Need a King?

2016 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 465-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
PETER J. LING
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Civil Rights Movement ◽  
Martin Luther ◽  
Malcolm X ◽  
Henry Louis Gates ◽  
Cornel West ◽  
Martin Luther King

Not every book sent for review comes with two pages of endorsements from the great and the good. Stokely is accompanied by glowing approval from such familiar names as Henry Louis Gates, Cornel West, Robin D. G. Kelley, Michael Eric Dyson, Gerald Horne, Charles Oglethorpe, and David Levering Lewis. Even without the para-textual apparatus to guide one's judgement, however, there is enough in this biography of Stokely Carmichael for any scholar of the civil rights movement to relish. This may not be the “definitive biography” that John Stauffer declares it to be, but it is indisputably important. In essence, Joseph argues that Stokely is the missing panel in a triptych of heroes, flanked on either side by the already canonized Malcolm X and Martin Luther King. In key respects, he insists, Stokely was the synthesis of Malcolm and Martin.

Malcolm X and the Enigma of Martin Luther King, Jr.’s Nonviolence

Acorn ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 18-23
Author(s):  
Laurence Bove ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Martin Luther ◽  
Malcolm X ◽  
Martin Luther King
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document