Civil competency restoration: Initial findings from psychological-based civil competency evaluations.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
George J. Demakis ◽  
Madison G. Gallimore ◽  
Stephen Strzelecki ◽  
Sean B. Knuth
Keyword(s):  
Competency Restoration ◽  
Competency Evaluations

Competency Restoration Assessment

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Shapiro ◽  
Brian Apple ◽  
Jason Henle ◽  
M. Ross Seligson
Keyword(s):  
Competency Restoration

Competency Evaluations on the Consultation-Liaison Service

1999 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Umapathy ◽  
Dilip Ramchandani ◽  
Ruth M. Lamdan ◽  
Lori A. Kishel ◽  
Barbara A. Schindler
Keyword(s):  
Competency Evaluations

scholarly journals Variability in multi-rater competency assessments

1999 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Theron ◽  
G. Roodt
Keyword(s):  
Organisational Structure ◽  
Competency Evaluations ◽  
Competency Assessments

The purpose of this study was to determine if significant differences exist between the multi-rater competency evaluations of employees operating within a flat organisational structure. Sixty-eight marketing employees were each evaluated by a number of raters including themselves, their managers, customers and peers. A competency questionnaire was developed by using the input of the employees who took part in the appraisal. Using paired t- tests significant differences between the various groups of raters were found. These findings and the implications thereof are discussed. Opsomming Die doel van hierdie studie was om te bepaal of daar beduidende verskille bestaan tussen die multi-beoordelaar bevoegdheidsevaluerings van werknemers wat binne 'n plat organisasiestruktuur funksioneer. Agt-en-sestig bemarkingswerknemers is elk beoordeel deur 'n aantal beoordelaars wat die werknemers self, hul bestuurders, kliente en kollegas ingesluit het. 'n Bevoegdheidsvraelys is ontwikkel deur gebruik te maak van die insette van die werknemers wat deel geneem het aan die evaluering. Deur die gebruik van gepaarde t-toetse is gevind dat daar beduidende verskille bestaan tussen sommige van die groepe beoordelaars. Hierdie bevindinge en die implikasies daarvan word bespreek.

The clinician's role in competency evaluations

1989 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 397-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth H. Kaplan ◽  
Marilyn Price
Keyword(s):  
Competency Evaluations
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document