Comparative impact of professional mental health background on ratings of consumer outcome and fidelity in an illness management and recovery program.

2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 236-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Garber-Epstein ◽  
Yaara Zisman-Ilani ◽  
Stephen Levine ◽  
David Roe
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Illness Management ◽  
Illness Management And Recovery ◽  
Professional Mental Health ◽  
Recovery Program

Illness management and recovery program for mental health problems: reducing symptoms and increasing social functioning

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (21-22) ◽  
pp. 3471-3485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chay Huang Sharon Tan ◽  
Rohaida Binte Ishak ◽  
Tan Xiong Gentatsu Lim ◽  
Palaniappan Marimuthusamy ◽  
Kuldip Kaurss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Social Functioning ◽  
Mental Health Problems ◽  
Health Problems ◽  
Illness Management ◽  
Illness Management And Recovery ◽  
Recovery Program

scholarly journals Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of interpersonal community psychiatric treatment (ICPT) for people with long-term severe non-psychotic mental disorders: a multi-Centre randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark van Veen ◽  
Bauke Koekkoek ◽  
Steven Teerenstra ◽  
Eddy Adang ◽  
Cornelis L. Mulder
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Mental Health ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Community Mental Health ◽  
Mental Health Treatment ◽  
Psychiatric Treatment ◽  
Illness Management ◽  
Illness Management And Recovery ◽  
Perceived Difficulty

Abstract Background Long-term community mental health treatment for non-psychotic disorder patients with severe mental illness (SMI) who are perceived as difficult by clinicians, is poorly developed and lacks a structured, goal-centred approach. This study compares (cost-)effectiveness of Interpersonal Community Psychiatric Treatment (ICPT) with Care As Usual (CAU) on quality of life and clinician perceived difficulty in the care for non-psychotic disorder SMI-patients. A multi-centre cluster-randomized clinical tria was conducted in which Community Mental Health Nurses (Clinicians) in three large community mental health services in the Netherlands were randomly allocated to providing either ICPT or CAU to included patients. A total of 56 clinicians were randomized, who treated a total of 93 patients (59 in ICPT-group and 34 in CAU-group). Methods Primary outcome measure is patient-perceived quality of life as measured by the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA). Secondary outcome measures include clinician-perceived difficulty, general mental health, treatment outcomes, illness management and recovery, therapeutic relationship, care needs and social network. Patients were assessed at baseline, during treatment (6 months), after treatment (12 months) and at 6 months follow-up (18 months). Linear mixed-effects models for repeated measurements were used to compare mean changes in primary and secondary outcomes between intervention and control group of patients over time on an intention to treat basis. Potential efficiency was investigated from a societal perspective. Economic evaluation was based on general principles of a cost-effectiveness analysis. Outcome measures for health economic evaluation, were costs, and Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs). Results Half of the intended number of patients were recruited. There was no statistically significant treatment effect found in the MANSA (0.17, 95%-CI [− 0.058,0.431], p = 0.191). Treatment effects showed significant improvement in the Different Doctor-Patient Relationship Questionnaire-scores and a significant increase in the Illness Management and Recovery–scale Client-version scores). No effects of ICPT on societal and medical costs nor QALYs were found. Conclusions This is the first RCT to investigate the (cost)-effectiveness of ICPT. Compared with CAU, ICPT did not improve quality of life, but significantly reduced clinician-perceived difficulty, and increased subjective illness management and recovery. No effects on costs or QALY’s were found. Trial registration NTR 3988, registered 13 May 2013.

Participants’ and staffs’ evaluation of the Illness Management and Recovery program: a randomized clinical trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helle Stentoft Dalum ◽  
Anna Kristine Waldemar ◽  
Lisa Korsbek ◽  
Carsten Hjorthøj ◽  
John Hagel Mikkelsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Illness Management ◽  
Illness Management And Recovery ◽  
Recovery Program

scholarly journals Consumer and provider responses to a computerized version of the Illness Management and Recovery Program.

2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 231-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Wright-Berryman ◽  
Michelle P. Salyers ◽  
James P. O'Halloran ◽  
Aaron S. Kemp ◽  
Kim T. Mueser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Illness Management ◽  
Illness Management And Recovery ◽  
Recovery Program

Implementing the Illness Management and Recovery Program for Consumers With Severe Mental Illness

2009 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 483-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle P. Salyers ◽  
Jenna L. Godfrey ◽  
Alan B. McGuire ◽  
Tim Gearhart ◽  
Angela L. Rollins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Illness ◽  
Severe Mental Illness ◽  
Illness Management ◽  
Illness Management And Recovery ◽  
Recovery Program

scholarly journals The Illness Management and Recovery Program: an international effectiveness study

2006 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 246-247
Author(s):  
R Clancy ◽  
D Clancy ◽  
K Mueser ◽  
V Carr ◽  
T Lewin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Illness Management ◽  
Effectiveness Study ◽  
Illness Management And Recovery ◽  
Recovery Program
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document