Multimethod adherence measurement in an evidence-based parenting program.

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 290-305
Author(s):  
Dana M. Sheshko ◽  
Catherine M. Lee ◽  
Marie-Hélène Gagné
Keyword(s):  
Parenting Program ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Adherence Measurement

Risk factors for attrition from an evidence-based parenting program: Findings from the Netherlands

2016 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. 42-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariëlle E. Abrahamse ◽  
Larissa N. Niec ◽  
Marianne Junger ◽  
Frits Boer ◽  
Ramón J.L. Lindauer
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Parenting Program ◽  
Evidence Based

Promoting Program Fidelity through Peer-Assisted Supervision and Support

2017 ◽  
pp. 405-416
Author(s):  
Kerri E. McPherson ◽  
Birgit Schroeter
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assurance ◽  
Parenting Program ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Parenting Interventions ◽  
Peer Supervision ◽  
Program Fidelity ◽  
Supervision Models ◽  
Quality Assurance Mechanism ◽  
Support Model

This chapter makes the case for the adoption of practitioner supervision as a quality assurance mechanism for the implementation of parenting interventions. This chapter addresses the need for effective and efficient supervision and posttraining support for the evidence-based program workforce to ensure the sustainability of delivery and the ongoing maintenance of program fidelity. Alongside other fidelity mechanisms, supervision can help develop practitioners’ confidence and competence in delivery and promote adherence to intervention protocols. Peer supervision has the potential to be both efficient and effective and may be more acceptable to stakeholders than traditional hierarchical supervision models. The Peer-Assisted Supervision and Support model is described, and findings describing its acceptability and feasibility to parenting program practitioners are presented.

Development and Validation of Fidelity Monitoring and Enhancement in an Evidence-Based Parenting Program

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 569-580
Author(s):  
Matthew R. Sanders ◽  
Carmen S. Spry ◽  
Cassandra L. Tellegen ◽  
James N. Kirby ◽  
Carol M. Metzler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parenting Program ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Fidelity Monitoring ◽  
Development And Validation

scholarly journals How evidence-based is an 'evidence-based parenting program'? A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis of Triple P

BMC Medicine ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Wilson ◽  
Robert Rush ◽  
Susan Hussey ◽  
Christine Puckering ◽  
Fiona Sim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Parenting Program ◽  
Triple P ◽  
Evidence Based

scholarly journals Changes in practitioners’ attitudes, perceived training needs and self-efficacy over the implementation process of an evidence-based parenting program

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Kim Côté ◽  
Marie-Hélène Gagné
Keyword(s):  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Organizational Capacity ◽  
Implementation Process ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Training Needs ◽  
Parenting Program ◽  
Triple P ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Ebp Implementation ◽  
Evidence Based Programs

Abstract Background Evidence-based family support programs such as the Triple P – Positive Parenting Program have the potential to enhance the well-being of children and families. However, they cannot achieve their expected outcomes if insufficient attention is paid to the implementation process. It has been demonstrated that practitioners’ attitudes towards evidence-based programs (EBPs), perceived training needs and self-efficacy for working with parents influence implementation outcomes (e.g., program acceptability, adoption, adherence and sustainability). At the same time, the experience of being involved in the implementation process of an EBP could enhance practitioners’ perceptions of the initiative. This study aimed to assess changes in practitioner’s attitudes, perceived training needs and self-efficacy over a two-year EBP implementation process, in interaction with their appraisal of their organization’s capacity to implement the EPB. Methods In the province of Quebec, Canada, Triple P was implemented and evaluated in two communities. Ninety-nine practitioners from various organizations completed questionnaires shortly before their training in Triple P and two years later. Results Findings show that practitioners who displayed more initial skepticism regarding their organization’s capacity to implement the program reported greater improvements in attitudes over time, while practitioners who showed more optimism at baseline reported a greater decrease in their perceived training needs. Practitioners’ self-efficacy increased moderately regardless of perceived organizational capacity. Conclusions These results are encouraging given that more positive perceptions of EBPs could foster the systematic use of these programs in communities, for the potential benefit of a greater number of families.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document