Personality inventory for DSM–5, Brief Form: Factor structure, reliability, and coefficient of congruence.

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-77
Author(s):  
Rapson Gomez ◽  
Shaun Watson ◽  
Vasileios Stavropoulos
Keyword(s):  
Form Factor ◽  
Factor Structure ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Structure Reliability

The Personality Inventory for DSM-5–Brief Form: An Examination of Internal Consistency, Factor Structure, and Relationship to Aggression in an Incarcerated Offender Sample

Assessment ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 107319112091679
Author(s):  
Ashley L. Dunne ◽  
Justin S. Trounson ◽  
Jason Skues ◽  
Jeff E. Pfeifer ◽  
James R. P. Ogloff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aggressive Behavior ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Factor Structure ◽  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Personality Characteristics ◽  
Male Offenders ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Significant Relationships ◽  
Preliminary Support

This study evaluated the internal consistency and factor structure of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5–Brief Form (PID-5-BF), and its relationship to aggression in 438 incarcerated Australian male offenders. Results provide support for the internal consistency and five-factor and bifactor structure of the PID-5-BF. The PID-5-BF total score, as well as the domains of Antagonism, Disinhibition, and Negative Affect (low), demonstrated significant relationships with aggression. These results provide preliminary support for the psychometric properties of the PID-5-BF within prison settings, and suggest that a PID-5-BF assessment may be useful within forensic settings to screen for broad maladaptive personality characteristics that are indicative of a greater propensity for aggressive behavior.

Utility of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5–Brief Form (PID-5-BF) in the Measurement of Maladaptive Personality and Psychopathology

Assessment ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 596-607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaime L. Anderson ◽  
Martin Sellbom ◽  
Randall T. Salekin
Keyword(s):  
Factor Structure ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
External Criterion ◽  
Reliability Factor ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Dimensional Measure ◽  
Scale Scores ◽  
Personality Psychopathology

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders–Fifth edition ( DSM-5) Personality and Personality Disorders workgroup developed the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) for the assessment of the alternative trait model for DSM-5. Along with this measure, the American Psychiatric Association published an abbreviated version, the PID-5–Brief form (PID-5-BF). Although this measure is available on the DSM-5 website for use, only two studies have evaluated its psychometric properties and validity and no studies have examined the U.S. version of this measure. The current study evaluated the reliability, factor structure, and construct validity of PID-5-BF scale scores. This included an evaluation of the scales’ associations with Section II PDs, a well-validated dimensional measure of personality psychopathology, and broad externalizing and internalizing psychopathology measures. We found support for the reliability of PID-5-BF scales as well as for the factor structure of the measure. Furthermore, a series of correlation and regression analyses showed conceptually expected associations between PID-5-BF and external criterion variables. Finally, we compared the correlations with external criterion measures to those of the full-length PID-5 and PID-5–Short form. Intraclass correlation analyses revealed a comparable pattern of correlations across all three measures, thereby supporting the use of the PID-5-BF as a screening measure of dimensional maladaptive personality traits.

Recovering the HEXACO Personality Factors – and Psychoticism – From Variable Sets Assessing Normal and Abnormal Personality

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 68-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael C. Ashton ◽  
Kibeom Lee
Keyword(s):  
Factor Structure ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Personality Factors ◽  
Factor Space ◽  
Personality Dimensions ◽  
Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Joint Factor ◽  
Self Reports ◽  
Neo Personality Inventory Revised

Abstract. We examined the joint factor structure of the 30 facets of the NEO Personality Inventory – Revised (NEO-PI-R; or the NEO-PI-3) with either (a) the 25 facets of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) or (b) the 15 facets of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP) plus several dissociation scales, using self-reports from participant samples of previous research. The NEO-PI-R[3]/PID-5 variable set produced seven factors that represented the HEXACO factor space plus a “psychoticism” dimension. The NEO-PI-R/SNAP/dissociation variable set produced a similar set of seven factors. The results indicate that even some questionnaire variable sets not constructed to measure the HEXACO factors can recover those personality dimensions. Researchers interested in integrating the domains of normal and abnormal personality are advised to adopt a model consisting of six HEXACO-like dimensions plus a dimension of psychotic tendency.

The Hierarchical Structure and Predictive Validity of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 in Chinese Nonclinical Adolescents

Assessment ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 107319112110228
Author(s):  
Wenjuan Zhang ◽  
Mengcheng Wang ◽  
Meng Yu ◽  
Jianping Wang
Keyword(s):  
Factor Structure ◽  
Social Adjustment ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Longitudinal Assessment ◽  
Present Sample ◽  
Dsm 5

To evaluate the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) in Chinese nonclinical adolescents, a total of 1,442 Chinese middle school youths ( Mage = 14.85, girls = 52.4%) were recruited in the present study. All the participants completed the full-length 220-item PID-5. Some participants ( n = 1,003) were administered adolescents’ social adjustment as a criterion measure at the same time and 236 participants took part in longitudinal assessment of the PID-5 and adolescents’ social adjustment 6 months later. First, exploratory structural equation modeling analyses supported a six-factor structure of the PID-5 in our present sample. Second, Negative Affectivity, Detachment, Antagonistic, and Disinhibition domains had positive correlations with negative social adjustment, and negative correlations with positive social adjustment concurrently and longitudinally, with the exception of Constraint and Psychoticism. Third, Cronbach’s alpha for the PID-5 traits ranged from .57 to .91 in the full sample. The 6-month test–retest reliability by indexes of interclass correlation coefficient showed poor to good stability. As a whole, our findings provided preliminary evidence of the PID-5 as a reliable and valid measure of adolescents’ maladaptive personality traits in mainland China.

scholarly journals Development of a Short and ICD-11 Compatible Measure for DSM-5 Maladaptive Personality Traits Using Ant Colony Optimization Algorithms

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
André Kerber ◽  
Martin Schultze ◽  
Steffen Müller ◽  
Rosa Maria Rühling ◽  
Aidan G.C. Wright ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ant Colony Optimization ◽  
Optimization Algorithms ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Ant Colony ◽  
Latent Structure ◽  
Total N ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Structure Reliability ◽  
German Speaking ◽  
Ant Colony Optimization Algorithms

While DSM-5 Section III and ICD-11 both allow for dimensional assessment of personality pathology, the models differ in the definition of maladaptive traits. In this study, we pursued the goal of developing a short and reliable assessment for maladaptive traits, which is compatible with both models, using the item pool of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). To this aim, we applied ant colony optimization algorithms in English- and German-speaking samples comprising a total N = 2927. This procedure yielded a 34-item measure with a hierarchical latent structure including six maladaptive trait domains and 17 trait facets, the “Personality Inventory for DSM-5, Brief Form Plus” (PID5BF+). Latent structure, reliability and criterion validity were ascertained in the original as well as in two separate validation samples (N=849, N=493) and the measure was able to discriminate personality disorders from other diagnoses in a clinical subsample. The results suggest that the PID5BF+ is a useful measure of the DSM-5 maladaptive trait domains, but needs further revision for capturing ICD-11 Anankastia.

The Factor Structure of the Portuguese Version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5)

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. S259-S259 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Pires ◽  
A. Sousa Ferreira ◽  
B. Gonçalves
Keyword(s):  
Factor Structure ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Oblique Rotation ◽  
Personality Differences ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Exploratory Factor Analyses ◽  
Competing Interest

IntroductionThe DSM-5 Section III proposes a dimensional-categorical model of conceptualizing personality and its disorders, which includes assessment of impairments in personality functioning (criterion A) and maladaptive personality traits (criterion B). The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) is a self-report, composed of 220 items, organized into 25 facets nested in five domains of personality differences, and was developed to operationalize criterion B.ObjectivesThis study explores the factor structure of the Portuguese adaptation of the PID-5.AimsThe five-factor structure that has emerged in previous studies with the PID-5 (cf. Krueger & Markon) is expected to be replicated in the current study.MethodsExploratory factor analyses with varimax oblique rotation were conducted on a sample of Portuguese adults from the general population (n = 379, Mage = 31.49, SD = 14.16, 25.3% males, 74.7% females).ResultsA six factor structure was retained in which the first 5 factors resemble the PID-5 domains. The model showed good fit indices (KMO = 0.897). The total explained variance was 68.25%. All the facets but four had primary loadings on the expected factor.ConclusionsThe similarity of results across studies and nationalities contributes to the validation of the Portuguese translation of the PID-5 and highlights the structural resemblance among the DSM-5 model and the five factor model (FFM) and the personality psychopathology-five model (PSY-5), drawing attention to the relevance of these models for the diagnosis of Personality Disorders.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

scholarly journals Development of a Short and ICD-11 Compatible Measure for DSM-5 Maladaptive Personality Traits Using Ant Colony Optimization Algorithms

Assessment ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 107319112097184
Author(s):  
André Kerber ◽  
Martin Schultze ◽  
Steffen Müller ◽  
Rosa Maria Rühling ◽  
Aidan G. C. Wright ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ant Colony Optimization ◽  
Optimization Algorithms ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Ant Colony ◽  
Latent Structure ◽  
Total N ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Structure Reliability ◽  
Ant Colony Optimization Algorithms

While Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders–Fifth edition ( DSM-5) Section III and ICD-11 (International Classification of Diseases 11th–Revision) both allow for dimensional assessment of personality pathology, the models differ in the definition of maladaptive traits. In this study, we pursued the goal of developing a short and reliable assessment for maladaptive traits, which is compatible with both models, using the item pool of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). To this aim, we applied ant colony optimization algorithms in English- and German-speaking samples comprising a total N of 2,927. This procedure yielded a 34-item measure with a hierarchical latent structure including six maladaptive trait domains and 17 trait facets, the “Personality Inventory for DSM-5, Brief Form Plus” (PID5BF+). While latent structure, reliability, and criterion validity were ascertained in the original and in two separate validation samples ( n = 849, n = 493) and the measure was able to discriminate personality disorders from other diagnoses in a clinical subsample, results suggest further modifications for capturing ICD-11 Anankastia.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document