scholarly journals Development and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation of a Brief Self-Report Questionnaire for the Assessment of the DSM–5 level of Personality Functioning Scale: The LPFS Brief Form (LPFS-BF).

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 192-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joost Hutsebaut ◽  
Dine J. Feenstra ◽  
Jan H. Kamphuis
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Evaluation ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Personality Functioning ◽  
Dsm 5

Assessing Self-Definition and Relatedness in Level of Personality Functioning

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Emily C. Mariotti ◽  
Mark H. Waugh ◽  
Cara M. McClain ◽  
Lorrie G. Beevers ◽  
A. Jill Clemence ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psychological Assessment ◽  
Clinical Utility ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Case Vignette ◽  
Core Component ◽  
Personality Functioning ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Assessment And Treatment ◽  
Development And Validation ◽  
Report Measure

The two polarities model (TPM) of personality organizes psychological assessment and psychotherapy and connects to personality disorder diagnosis using the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD). The authors developed scales assessing the TPM from an existing self-report measure for level of personality functioning (LPF), a core component of the AMPD. Iterative content analyses of the LPF measure yielded scales for Autonomy and Communion corresponding to dimensions of the TPM. The scales were refined via internal consistency analyses using a measure of psychological attachment and studied in development and validation samples. Associations with relevant external criteria were explored in a series of multiple regressions. The new content-based LPF scales were illustrated with a case vignette. Although the new Autonomy/Communion scales await further validation prior to clinical use, initial evidence suggests that they may bridge the nomological nets of the TPM and AMPD and potentially offer clinical utility in assessment and treatment planning.

scholarly journals Validity of the DSM–5 Levels of Personality Functioning Scale–Self Report

2018 ◽  
Vol 100 (6) ◽  
pp. 650-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Hopwood ◽  
Evan W. Good ◽  
Leslie C. Morey
Keyword(s):  
Self Report ◽  
Personality Functioning ◽  
Dsm 5

The Inter-Rater Reliability and Validity of the Italian Translation of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders Module I and Module II: A Preliminary Report on Consecutively Admitted Psychotherapy Outpatients

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement C) ◽  
pp. 95-123
Author(s):  
Antonella Somma ◽  
Serena Borroni ◽  
Giulia Gialdi ◽  
Davide Carlotta ◽  
Laura Emanuela Giarolli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Personality Disorders ◽  
Alternative Model ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Clinical Utility ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Clinical Interview ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Rater Reliability ◽  
Personality Functioning ◽  
Dsm 5

To evaluate the reliability and convergent validity of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (SCID-5-AMPD) Module I and Module II, 88 adult psychotherapy participants were administered the Italian translations of the SCID-5-AMPD Module I and Module II, Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form (LPFS-BF), Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Self Report (LPFS-SF), Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5), Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4+ (PDQ-4+), and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Personality Disorders (SCID-5-PD) relying on a Williams crossover design. SCID-5-AMPD Module I and Module II showed excellent inter-rater reliability. In terms of convergent validity, meaningful associations were observed between SCID-5-AMPD Module I scores and self-report measures of Criterion A; similarly, SCID-5-AMPD Module II trait scores were meaningfully related to PID-5 trait scores. As a whole, our preliminary findings supported the clinical utility of DSM-5 AMPD.

scholarly journals Assessment of ICD-11 Personality Disorder Severity in Forensic Patients Using the Semi-structured Interview for Personality Functioning DSM-5 (STiP-5.1): Preliminary Findings

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joost Hutsebaut ◽  
Laura C. Weekers ◽  
Nynke Tuin ◽  
Jessica S. P. Apeldoorn ◽  
Erik Bulten
Keyword(s):  
Structured Interview ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Assessment Instruments ◽  
Specific Information ◽  
Forensic Patients ◽  
Personality Functioning ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Forensic Psychiatric ◽  
Expert Ratings

In forensic settings, several challenges may affect reliability of assessment of personality pathology, specifically when based upon self-report. This study investigates the Semi-Structured Interview for DSM-5 Personality Functioning (STiP-5.1) to assess level of severity of personality functioning in incarcerated patients. Thirty inpatients of three forensic psychiatric facilities completed the STiP 5.1 and additionally completed self-report questionnaires assessing symptom severity, personality functioning and traits. Staff members completed informant versions of personality functioning questionnaires. Previously assessed community (N = 18) and clinical samples (N = 80) were used as a reference. Interrater reliability and internal consistency of the STiP 5.1 were good. As expected, no associations were found between self-report and expert-ratings (STiP 5.1) of personality functioning. Remarkably, no associations were found between informant rated personality functioning and the STiP 5.1. This study confirms the discrepancies between self-report and expert-ratings in forensic settings and identifies the need to design and test assessment instruments within this context instead of generalizing findings obtained in regular mental health care samples. The STiP-5.1 may be a candidate for use in forensic samples, particularly to guide treatment planning and individual patient policy, although it remains unclear what specific information it offers above and beyond self-report and informant-report.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document