scholarly journals Development and validation of the Body Understanding Measure for Pregnancy Scale (BUMPS) and its role in antenatal attachment.

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 1092-1106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Kirk ◽  
Catherine Preston
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Kirk ◽  
Catherine Preston

Pregnancy is a unique period in a woman’s life during which her body undergoes rapid and dramatic change. Many of these changes are in direct conflict to social ideals of female body appearance, such as increases in body size and weight. Existing research that has examined body satisfaction in pregnancy is limited by the use of measures that are not designed for pregnancy, yielding biased results. Two studies have attempted to develop measures for pregnancy but have used sub-optimal sample sizes and/or have not fully validated the measure with independent samples. We seek to address these limitations in the current study and report the development and validation of the newly developed Body Understanding Measure for Pregnancy scale (BUMPs) in 613 pregnant women across two independent samples. Exploratory factor analysis revealed three factors; satisfaction with appearing pregnant, weight gain concerns and physical burdens of pregnancy, which were confirmed with confirmatory factor analysis. Multiple Indicators Multiple Causes (MIMIC) modelling indicated the scale is appropriate for women in all three trimesters of pregnancy. Evidence of internal reliability, test-retest reliability and convergent validity provide excellent psychometric support. We further demonstrated construct validity by supporting three hypotheses, finding that more positive body satisfaction in pregnancy was related to (a) better relationship quality (b) lower depression and anxiety (c) higher levels of interoception, specifically body listening and body trusting. Additionally, we present evidence that BUMPs is the strongest predictor of antenatal attachment compared with depression, anxiety, gestational age and relationship satisfaction.


Author(s):  
Peter J. Cooper ◽  
Melanie J. Taylor ◽  
Zafra Cooper ◽  
Christopher G. Fairbum

Author(s):  
C. Victor Herbin III

Prior studies provided insight on arrogance at the individual level and how arrogant individuals express superiority through (1) overconfidence in capabilities, (2) dismissiveness, (3) and disparagement, and how these behaviors may negatively impact those employees in and around their work teams, yet did not indicate how these behaviors impact organizational culture. Organizational arrogance represents an emerging concept that describes arrogance at the organizational level. Organizational arrogance provides the body of knowledge with a comprehensive and inclusive definition that led to the development and validation of the Organizational Arrogance Scale with a Cronbach Alpha of .922 that accurately measures the presence of organizational arrogance.


2002 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Cash ◽  
Emily Fleming ◽  
Jenny Alindogan ◽  
Laura Steadman ◽  
Abigail Whitehead

2016 ◽  
Vol 68 (8) ◽  
pp. 1158-1165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa R. Jewett ◽  
Vanessa L. Malcarne ◽  
Linda Kwakkenbos ◽  
Diana Harcourt ◽  
Nichola Rumsey ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Hilary Weingarden ◽  
Keith D. Renshaw ◽  
June P. Tangney ◽  
Sabine Wilhelm

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (9) ◽  
pp. 990-997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lotte Poulsen ◽  
Andrea Pusic ◽  
Sam Robson ◽  
Jens Ahm Sorensen ◽  
Michael Rose ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document