Cross-validation of the demoralization construct in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory.

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda A. Uliaszek ◽  
Nadia Al-Dajani ◽  
Martin Sellbom ◽  
R. Michael Bagby
Keyword(s):  
Cross Validation ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Revised Neo Personality Inventory

scholarly journals Low Openness on the Revised NEO Personality Inventory as a Risk Factor for Treatment-Resistant Depression

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. e71964 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michio Takahashi ◽  
Yukihiko Shirayama ◽  
Katsumasa Muneoka ◽  
Masatoshi Suzuki ◽  
Koichi Sato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Treatment Resistant Depression ◽  
Treatment Resistant ◽  
Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Revised Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Resistant Depression

Revised Neo Personality Inventory Profiles of Narcissistic and Nonnarcissistic People

1994 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 512-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nerella V. Ramanaiah ◽  
Fred R. J. Detwiler ◽  
Anupama Byravan
Keyword(s):  
Construct Validity ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Personality Profiles ◽  
Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Narcissistic Personality ◽  
Revised Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Narcissistic Personality Inventory ◽  
Univariate Analyses

This study investigated the construct validity of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory against the Revised NEO Personality Inventory to test the hypothesis that narcissistic and nonnarcissistic people have different personality profiles The two inventories were administered to 96 male and 92 female undergraduates Multivariate as well as univariate analyses of variance indicated that the Revised NEO Personality Inventory profiles were significantly different for narcissistic and nonnarcissistic groups which supported the construct validity of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory.

scholarly journals Revised NEO Personality Inventory Profiles of Male and Female U.S. Air Force Pilots

1999 ◽  
Vol 164 (12) ◽  
pp. 885-890 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph D. Callister ◽  
Raymond E. King ◽  
Paul D. Retzlaff ◽  
Royden W. Marsh
Keyword(s):  
Air Force ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Male And Female ◽  
Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Revised Neo Personality Inventory

On the Incremental Validity of MMPI–2 Psychopathology–5 Scales over the Revised Neo Personality Inventory Scales for Predicting Personality Disorders

2002 ◽  
Vol 90 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1084-1090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anupama Byravan ◽  
Nerella V. Ramanaiah
Keyword(s):  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Personality Disorders ◽  
Multiple Regression Analysis ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Incremental Validity ◽  
Second Step ◽  
Hierarchical Multiple Regression ◽  
Adjective Checklist ◽  
Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Revised Neo Personality Inventory

The hypothesis that the MMPI–2 Psychopathology–5 scales are better predictors of personality disorders than the Revised NEO Personality Inventory scales was tested using Personality Adjective Checklist personality disorder scales with a 9-point response format. The three inventories were completed by 258 introductory psychology students (113 men and 145 women) for partial course credit. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis was performed for predicting each Personality Adjective Checklist scale by entering the Revised NEO Personality Inventory scales as a set in the first step and the Psychopathology–5 scales as a set in the second step. Incremental validity of the Psychopathology–5 scales over the Revised NEO Personality Inventory scales for predicting each Personality Adjective Checklist scale was measured by the R2 change at the end of the second step in the hierarchical multiple regression analysis. Incremental validity values ranged from .01 to .09, with a median of .03, and were significant for only five Personality Adjective Checklist scales. Such results provided very little support for the hypothesis of relative superiority of the Psychopathology–5 scales over the Revised NEO Personality Inventory domain scales for predicting personality disorders.

Argumentativeness and the Facets of the Big Five

1997 ◽  
Vol 81 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1379-1385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerhard Blickle
Keyword(s):  
Big Five ◽  
Personality Trait ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Openness To Experience ◽  
Female Students ◽  
Controversial Issues ◽  
Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Multivariate Study ◽  
Revised Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Domain Level

Argumentativeness is conceptualized as a personality trait which predisposes an individual to recognize controversial issues and to advocate or refute positions on them. In a multivariate study with 166 male and 120 female students, the relationships between scores on the Argumentativeness scales and the facet and domain scales of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (Form S) were analyzed. At the facet level, scores on Tendency to Approach arguments and Argumentativeness correlated significantly with scores on Assertiveness and Openness to Ideas, and scores on Tendency to Avoid arguments correlated significantly with scores on Self-consciousness and Assertiveness. At the domain level, scores on Openness to Experience correlated significantly with those on Tendency to Approach arguments and with the Argumentativeness scale and scores on Extraversion correlated significantly with Tendency to Avoid arguments and the Argumentativeness scale.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document