The role of common method variance in MMPI-2-RF response option augmentation.

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 126-131
Author(s):  
Seth C. Courrégé ◽  
Nathan C. Weed
Keyword(s):  
Common Method ◽  
Common Method Variance ◽  
Response Option ◽  
Method Variance

scholarly journals The Association Between Objective and Subjective Socioeconomic Standing and Subjective Well-Being: A Meta-Analytic Review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacinth Jia Xin Tan ◽  
Michael W. Kraus ◽  
Nichelle C. Carpenter ◽  
Nancy Adler
Keyword(s):  
Population Density ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Common Method ◽  
Subjective Well Being ◽  
Common Method Variance ◽  
Method Variance ◽  
Analytic Review ◽  
Subjective Ses

This meta-analysis tested if the links between socioeconomic standing (SES) and subjective well-being (SWB) differ by whether SES is assessed objectively or subjectively. The associations between measures of objective SES (i.e., income and educational attainment), subjective SES (i.e., the MacArthur ladder SES and perceived SES), and SWB (i.e., happiness and life satisfaction) were synthesized across 354 studies, totaling 2,352,095 participants. Overall, the objective SES and subjective SES measures were moderately associated (r = .32). The subjective SES-SWB association (r = .22) was larger than the objective SES-SWB association (r = .16). The income-SWB association (r = .23) was comparable to the ladder SES-SWB association (r = .22) but larger than the perceived SES-SWB association (r = .196). The education-SWB association (r = .12) was smaller than the associations with both measures of subjective SES. The subjective SES-SWB association was partially explained by common method variance. The subjective SES-SWB association, particularly with the ladder SES measure, also mediated the objective SES-SWB association. In moderation analyses, the objective SES-SWB associations strengthened as samples increased in wealth and population density. The subjective SES-SWB associations strengthened as samples increased in population density, decreased in income inequality and decreased in relative social mobility. The role of common method variance, social comparisons and other processes in explaining the SES-SWB links are discussed.

Common method variance in NEO-FFI and IPIP personality measurement

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Biderman ◽  
Nhung T. Nguyen ◽  
Christopher J. L. Cunningham
Keyword(s):  
Common Method ◽  
Personality Measurement ◽  
Common Method Variance ◽  
Method Variance
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document