Supplemental Material for Comparing Self-Report Measures of Grandiose Narcissism, Vulnerable Narcissism, and Narcissistic Personality Disorder in a Male Offender Sample

2018 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Personality Disorder ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Narcissistic Personality Disorder ◽  
Grandiose Narcissism ◽  
Vulnerable Narcissism ◽  
Narcissistic Personality ◽  
Male Offender

scholarly journals Comparing self-report measures of grandiose narcissism, vulnerable narcissism, and narcissistic personality disorder in a male offender sample

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Krusemark ◽  
W. Keith Campbell ◽  
Michael Crowe ◽  
Josh Miller
Keyword(s):  
Personality Disorder ◽  
Internalizing Symptoms ◽  
Externalizing Behaviors ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Narcissistic Personality Disorder ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Grandiose Narcissism ◽  
Vulnerable Narcissism ◽  
Narcissistic Personality ◽  
Hypersensitive Narcissism

Despite a growing interest in the use of self-report measures of narcissism among student, community and clinical samples, the research on narcissism in prison samples is sparse, despite elevated rates of narcissism in these samples. The current study examined the relations between commonly used measures of grandiose narcissism (Narcissistic Personality Inventory-13; NPI-13), vulnerable narcissism (Hypersensitive Narcissism Scale; HSNS) and narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) (Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire; PDQ) in a sample of adult male offenders (N = 179). The NPI-13 and PDQ NPD scales overlapped substantially with one another and manifested similar empirical profiles (rICC = .81) with both being substantially correlated with interview-based symptoms of NPD, entitlement, psychopathy, and externalizing behaviors. Conversely, the HSNS manifested more limited relations with other measures of NPD and related traits (e.g., entitlement), as well as externalizing behaviors and was more strongly related to internalizing symptoms. Consistent with previous work, NPD appears to be a blend of grandiose and vulnerable narcissism as the PDQ’s empirical profile overlapped with that of the HSNS (rICC = .51), which was not true for the NPI-13 (rICC = .18). Analyses of the incremental validity of the three measures suggested that the NPI-13 was particularly successful in accounting for unique variance in these relevant criteria. These results underscore the benefit of utilizing multiple measures to distinguish empirical correlates of grandiose narcissism, vulnerable narcissism and NPD.

Narcissistic personality disorder and self-esteem: An examination of differential relations with self-report and laboratory-based aggression

2010 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 559-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica L. Maples ◽  
Joshua D. Miller ◽  
Lauren F. Wilson ◽  
L. Alana Seibert ◽  
Lauren R. Few ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Personality Disorder ◽  
Self Esteem ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Narcissistic Personality Disorder ◽  
Narcissistic Personality ◽  
Differential Relations

Examining the Criterion Validity and Diagnostic Specificity of Self-Report Measures of Narcissism and Mania

Assessment ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-14
Author(s):  
David Watson ◽  
Stephanie Ellickson-Larew ◽  
Kasey Stanton ◽  
Holly F. Levin-Aspenson ◽  
Shereen Khoo
Keyword(s):  
Personality Disorder ◽  
Criterion Validity ◽  
Dark Triad ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Narcissistic Personality Disorder ◽  
Diagnostic Specificity ◽  
Narcissistic Personality ◽  
Key Issues ◽  
Two Measures ◽  
Hypomanic Personality Scale

We examined the validity of self-report measures of narcissism and mania by relating them to interview-based ratings of psychopathology. Narcissism scales were taken from the Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI), the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire–4+, and the Short Dark Triad. Mania measures included the Altman Self-Rated Mania Scale (ASRM) and scales taken from the Hypomanic Personality Scale (HPS) and Expanded Version of the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms. Our analyses addressed two key issues. The first issue was whether these scales demonstrated significant criterion validity (e.g., whether the HPS scales correlated significantly with interview ratings of mania). The second issue was whether they displayed specificity to their target constructs (e.g., whether the NPI scales correlated more strongly with ratings of narcissistic personality disorder than with other forms of psychopathology). All of the narcissism scales—including all three NPI subscales—correlated significantly with interview ratings of narcissistic personality disorder and showed considerable evidence of diagnostic specificity. Most of the mania scales also displayed good criterion validity and diagnostic specificity. However, two measures—the ASRM and the HPS Social Vitality subscale—had weak, nonsignificant associations with interview ratings of manic episodes; these findings raise concerns regarding their validity as specific indicators of mania.

The Relationship Between Narcissism and Personality Traits of the Five-Factor-Model in Adolescents and Young Adults

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 516-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Allroggen ◽  
Peter Rehmann ◽  
Eva Schürch ◽  
Carolyn C. Morf ◽  
Michael Kölch
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Personality Traits ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Adolescents And Young Adults ◽  
Personality Factors ◽  
Big Five Personality ◽  
Grandiose Narcissism ◽  
Vulnerable Narcissism ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract.Narcissism is seen as a multidimensional construct that consists of two manifestations: grandiose and vulnerable narcissism. In order to define these two manifestations, their relationship to personality factors has increasingly become of interest. However, so far no studies have considered the relationship between different phenotypes of narcissism and personality factors in adolescents. Method: In a cross-sectional study, we examine a group of adolescents (n = 98; average age 16.77 years; 23.5 % female) with regard to the relationship between Big Five personality factors and pathological narcissism using self-report instruments. This group is compared to a group of young adults (n = 38; average age 19.69 years; 25.6 % female). Results: Grandiose narcissism is primarily related to low Agreeableness and Extraversion, vulnerable narcissism to Neuroticism. We do not find differences between adolescents and young adults concerning the relationship between grandiose and vulnerable narcissism and personality traits. Discussion: Vulnerable and grandiose narcissism can be well differentiated in adolescents, and the pattern does not show substantial differences compared to young adults.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document