Supplemental Material for Is Dietary Restraint a Unitary or Multi-Faceted Construct?

2016 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Dietary Restraint

Regulatory focus and dietary restraint

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lenny R. Vartanian ◽  
C. Peter Herman
Keyword(s):  
Regulatory Focus ◽  
Dietary Restraint

High dietary restraint improves performance on a food-motivated probabilistic selection task

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer R Sadler ◽  
Grace Elisabeth Shearrer ◽  
Nichollette Acosta ◽  
Kyle Stanley Burger
Keyword(s):  
Reinforcement Learning ◽  
Instrumental Conditioning ◽  
Food Reinforcement ◽  
Dietary Restraint ◽  
Memory Task ◽  
Brain Response ◽  
Anthropometric Measures ◽  
Instrumental Task ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Reward And Punishment

BACKGROUND: Dietary restraint represents an individual’s intent to limit their food intake and has been associated with impaired passive food reinforcement learning. However, the impact of dietary restraint on an active, response dependent learning is poorly understood. In this study, we tested the relationship between dietary restraint and food reinforcement learning using an active, instrumental conditioning task. METHODS: A sample of ninety adults completed a response-dependent instrumental conditioning task with reward and punishment using sweet and bitter tastes. Brain response via functional MRI was measured during the task. Participants also completed anthropometric measures, reward/motivation related questionnaires, and a working memory task. Dietary restraint was assessed via the Dutch Restrained Eating Scale. RESULTS: Two groups were selected from the sample: high restraint (n=29, score >2.5) and low restraint (n=30; score <1.85). High restraint was associated with significantly higher BMI (p=0.003) and lower N-back accuracy (p=0.045). The high restraint group also was marginally better at the instrumental conditioning task (p=0.066, r=0.37). High restraint was also associated with significantly greater brain response in the intracalcarine cortex (MNI: 15, -69, 12; k=35, pfwe< 0.05) to bitter taste, compared to neutral taste.CONCLUSIONS: High restraint was associated with improved performance on an instrumental task testing how individuals learn from reward and punishment. This may be mediated by greater brain response in the primary visual cortex, which has been associated with mental representation. Results suggest that dietary restraint does not impair response-dependent reinforcement learning.

Personality and dimensions of dietary restraint

1998 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 371-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly A. Gendall ◽  
Peter R. Joyce ◽  
Patrick F. Sullivan ◽  
Cynthia M. Bulik
Keyword(s):  
Dietary Restraint

Dietary restraint of bulimic subjects following cognitive-behavioral or pharmacological treatment

1988 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 495-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elise M. Rossiter ◽  
W.Stewart Agras ◽  
Martha Losch ◽  
Christy F. Telch
Keyword(s):  
Pharmacological Treatment ◽  
Dietary Restraint ◽  
Cognitive Behavioral

scholarly journals Impact of Experimentally Induced Cognitive Dietary Restraint on Eating Behavior Traits, Appetite Sensations, and Markers of Stress during Energy Restriction in Overweight/Obese Women

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabelle Morin ◽  
Catherine Bégin ◽  
Julie Maltais-Giguère ◽  
Alexandra Bédard ◽  
André Tchernof ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Body Weight ◽  
Eating Behavior ◽  
Perceived Stress ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Dietary Restraint ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
Energy Restriction ◽  
Obese Women ◽  
Experimentally Induced

Weight loss has been associated with changes in eating behaviors and appetite sensations that favor a regain in body weight. Since traditional weight loss approaches emphasize the importance of increasing cognitive dietary restraint (CDR) to achieve negative energy imbalance, it is difficult to untangle the respective contributions of energy restriction and increases in CDR on factors that can eventually lead to body weight regain. The present study aimed at comparing the effects of energy restriction alone or in combination with experimentally induced CDR on eating behavior traits, appetite sensations, and markers of stress in overweight and obese women. We hypothesized that the combination of energy restriction and induced CDR would lead to more prevalent food cravings, increased appetite sensations, and higher cortisol concentrations than when energy restriction is not coupled with induced CDR. A total of 60 premenopausal women (mean BMI: 32.0 kg/m2; mean age: 39.4 y) were provided with a low energy density diet corresponding to 85% of their energy needs during a 4-week fully controlled period. At the same time, women were randomized to either a condition inducing an increase in CDR (CDR+ group) or a condition in which CDR was not induced (CRD− group). Eating behavior traits (Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire and Food Craving Questionnaire), appetite sensations (after standardized breakfast), and markers of stress (Perceived Stress Scale; postawakening salivary cortisol) were measured before (T = 0 week) and after (T = 4 weeks) the 4-week energy restriction, as well as 3 months later. There was an increase in CDR in the CDR+ group while no such change was observed in the CDR− group (p=0.0037). No between-group differences were observed for disinhibition, hunger, cravings, appetite sensations, perceived stress, and cortisol concentrations. These results suggest that a slight increase in CDR has no negative impact on factors regulating energy balance in the context of energy restriction.

scholarly journals Food cue exposure and body image satisfaction: The moderating role of BMI and dietary restraint

Body Image ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Kathrin Fett ◽  
Paul Lattimore ◽  
Anne Roefs ◽  
Nicole Geschwind ◽  
Anita Jansen
Keyword(s):  
Body Image ◽  
Dietary Restraint ◽  
Cue Exposure ◽  
Body Image Satisfaction ◽  
Moderating Role
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document