Estimating and testing for differential treatment effects on outcomes when the outcome variances differ.

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Todd E. Bodner
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Effects ◽  
Differential Treatment

The Comparative Efficacy of Christian and Secular Rational-Emotive Therapy with Christian Clients

1994 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 130-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Brad Johnson ◽  
Ronald Devries ◽  
Charles R Ridley ◽  
Donald Pettorini ◽  
Deland R. Peterson
Keyword(s):  
Therapeutic Efficacy ◽  
Treatment Effects ◽  
Differential Treatment ◽  
Psychotherapy Outcome ◽  
Comparative Efficacy ◽  
Rational Emotive Therapy ◽  
Negative Thinking ◽  
General Pathology ◽  
Accommodation Theory ◽  
Comparative Psychotherapy

The present study utilized a comparative psychotherapy outcome design to evaluate the relative therapeutic efficacy of Christian and secular RET with depressed Christian clients. Results showed both treatments significantly reduced depression, automatic negative thinking, irrational thinking, and general pathology. These gains were maintained after three months. There were no significant differential treatment effects. Results are discussed in terms of the implications for accommodation theory.

The Use of One or Three Semantic Associative Primes in Treating Anomia in Aphasia

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Naomi Hashimoto
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Effects ◽  
Differential Treatment ◽  
The Other ◽  
Effect Sizes ◽  
Single Subject ◽  
Positive Correlation ◽  
Treatment Data ◽  
Prime Condition ◽  
Naming Deficits ◽  
Treatment Design

Purpose The aims of the study were to investigate the use of semantic associative relationships as primes in treating naming deficits, or anomia, in aphasia and to determine if differential treatment effects would be found if 1 or 3 primes were presented. Method Ten individuals with varying degrees of anomia participated in the study. A single-subject, A-B treatment design with a cross-over component was used. A 1-PRIME condition (use of 1 prime) was compared with a 3-PRIMES condition (use of 3 primes) for each participant. Results Visual analyses of treatment data revealed improvements in 8 of 10 participants. Meaningful effect sizes were obtained in at least 1 of the conditions for 6 of the 10 participants. Slightly more participants demonstrated meaningful effect sizes in the 3-PRIMES condition than in the 1-PRIME condition. Correlation analyses revealed a positive correlation between the number of teaching episodes and 3-PRIMES probe performance. Conclusions The results support a protocol that uses semantic associative primes to increase naming accuracy in aphasia. The 3-PRIMES condition was slightly more beneficial than the 1-PRIME condition in terms of improving naming abilities in these participants, but there was no overwhelming advantage in using one or the other condition.

scholarly journals Identification of subgroups with differential treatment effects for longitudinal and multiresponse variables

2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (26) ◽  
pp. 4837-4855 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-Yin Loh ◽  
Haoda Fu ◽  
Michael Man ◽  
Victoria Champion ◽  
Menggang Yu
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Effects ◽  
Differential Treatment
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document