scholarly journals Tele-forensic interviewing to elicit children’s evidence—Benefits, risks, and practical considerations.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deirdre Brown ◽  
Danélle Walker ◽  
Erin Godden
Keyword(s):  
Forensic Interviewing

scholarly journals How to interview a child: Let’s learn forensic interviewing based on the NICHD guideline (1/3)

2019 ◽  
Vol 83 (0) ◽  
pp. IS-012-IS-012
Author(s):  
◽  
Yoshiko Habuchi ◽  
Ai Uemiya ◽  
Yuko Yasuda ◽  
Aki Akamine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Forensic Interviewing

Forensic Interviewing

2021 ◽  
pp. 1555-1578
Author(s):  
Kathleen Coulborn Faller
Keyword(s):  
Forensic Interviewing

scholarly journals Child forensic interviewing in Children's Advocacy Centers: Empirical data on a practice model

2007 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 1031-1052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodore P. Cross ◽  
Lisa M. Jones ◽  
Wendy A. Walsh ◽  
Monique Simone ◽  
David Kolko
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Data ◽  
Practice Model ◽  
Children's Advocacy Centers ◽  
Forensic Interviewing

scholarly journals I’ll show you what I witnessed. Children’s abilities to use non-anatomical dolls in forensic interviewing

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christiana Hartley
Keyword(s):  
Evidence Based ◽  
Child Witness ◽  
Past Event ◽  
Amount Of Information ◽  
Body Positioning ◽  
Anatomical Dolls ◽  
Forensic Interviewing

<p>Two studies examined the effectiveness of using non-anatomical (non-AD) dolls as an interview tool, to aid children's communication about body positioning. In the first study, 49 6-8-year-old children took part in a game. Thirty minutes to an hour later, they were interviewed using the Specialist Child Witness Interview model. This was done verbally or with the opportunity to use non-AD dolls to clarify their own and others' body positioning. There was no difference in the amount of information reported nor the accuracy of children's reports when comparing both conditions. To complement the first study, the second study examined jurors' perceptions of children's abilities to use non-AD dolls. Non-AD dolls were generally thought to be helpful, but jurors identified some risks. However, jurors did not have strong beliefs about how non-AD dolls would influence the evidence that children provided. When jurors viewed a video of a child recounting a past event, their beliefs about non-AD dolls were more influential when evaluating a child's credibility than whether or not a non-AD doll was used during the interview. Overall, even when used in conjunction with evidence-based techniques, these findings do not support the use of non-AD dolls to help communicate body positioning in child forensic interviewing.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document