scholarly journals Is subjective social status a unique correlate of physical health? A meta-analysis.

2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (12) ◽  
pp. 1109-1125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny M. Cundiff ◽  
Karen A. Matthews
2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 172-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Sweenie ◽  
Molly Basch ◽  
Ke Ding ◽  
Stefania Pinto ◽  
Marie L. Chardon ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (10) ◽  
pp. 979-987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ethan Zell ◽  
Jason E. Strickhouser ◽  
Zlatan Krizan

Gerontology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 466-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura B. Zahodne ◽  
A. Zarina Kraal ◽  
Afsara Zaheed ◽  
Ketlyne Sol

Background: Subjective social status (SSS) is associated with mental and physical health, independent of objective socioeconomic status (SES), but its association with late-life cognitive decline is unknown. Objective: This study characterizes the association between SSS and late-life memory trajectories in a large, nationally representative sample of older adults in the United States. Methods: Using data from 8,530 participants aged 65 years and older in the Health and Retirement Study, structural equation models tested associations between SSS, objective SES (i.e., educational attainment, occupation, income, and wealth), physical and mental health, and 6-year memory trajectories, controlling for sociodemographic characteristics. Results: Independent of objective SES, lower SSS was associated with worse initial memory but not subsequent memory decline. The association between SSS and initial memory was separately mediated by chronic diseases, stroke, and depressive symptoms. Conclusion: Results provide preliminary behavioral evidence for the deleterious effects of social stress on cognitive aging. These results may help inform the development of policies and interventions to reduce cognitive morbidity among older adults who perceive a low position on the social hierarchy.


Author(s):  
Peter P. Vitaliano ◽  
◽  
James M. Scanlan ◽  
Jianping Zhang

2021 ◽  
pp. 014616722110097
Author(s):  
Jennifer K. Bosson ◽  
Gregory J. Rousis ◽  
Roxanne N. Felig

We tested the novel hypothesis that men lower in status-linked variables—that is, subjective social status and perceived mate value—are relatively disinclined to offset their high hostile sexism with high benevolent sexism. Findings revealed that mate value, but not social status, moderates the hostile–benevolent sexism link among men: Whereas men high in perceived mate value endorse hostile and benevolent sexism linearly across the attitude range, men low in mate value show curvilinear sexism, characterized by declining benevolence as hostility increases above the midpoint. Study 1 ( N = 15,205) establishes the curvilinear sexism effect and shows that it is stronger among men than women. Studies 2 ( N = 328) and 3 ( N = 471) show that the curve is stronger among men low versus high in perceived mate value, and especially if they lack a serious relationship partner (Study 3). Discussion considers the relevance of these findings for understanding misogyny.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document