Assessing deictic relational responding in social anhedonia: A functional approach to the development of theory of mind impairments.

2008 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 360-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthieu Villatte ◽  
Jean-Louis Monestès ◽  
Louise McHugh ◽  
Esteve Freixa i Baqué ◽  
Gwenolé Loas
Keyword(s):  
Theory Of Mind ◽  
Functional Approach ◽  
Social Anhedonia ◽  
Relational Responding ◽  
Deictic Relational Responding

scholarly journals The neural basis of theory of mind and its relationship to social functioning and social anhedonia in individuals with schizophrenia

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 154-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Dodell-Feder ◽  
Laura M. Tully ◽  
Sarah Hope Lincoln ◽  
Christine I. Hooker
Keyword(s):  
Theory Of Mind ◽  
Social Functioning ◽  
Social Anhedonia ◽  
Neural Basis

A Review of Relational Frame Theory Research Into Deictic Relational Responding

2016 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 569-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria M. Montoya-Rodríguez ◽  
Francisco J. Molina ◽  
Louise McHugh
Keyword(s):  
Relational Frame Theory ◽  
Frame Theory ◽  
Relational Responding ◽  
Relational Frame ◽  
Deictic Relational Responding ◽  
Theory Research

scholarly journals Exploring Differential Trial-Type Effects and the Impact of a Read-Aloud Procedure on Deictic Relational Responding on the IRAP

2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deirdre Kavanagh ◽  
Yvonne Barnes-Holmes ◽  
Dermot Barnes-Holmes ◽  
Ciara McEnteggart ◽  
Martin Finn
Keyword(s):  
Trial Type ◽  
Read Aloud ◽  
Relational Responding ◽  
Deictic Relational Responding ◽  
The Impact

Assessing Deictic Relational Responding in Individuals With Social Anxiety Disorder: Evidence of Perspective-Taking Difficulties

2014 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gwenny Janssen ◽  
Hubert De Mey ◽  
Annemieke Hendriks ◽  
Anne Koppers ◽  
Maarten Kaarsemaker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anxiety Disorder ◽  
Social Anxiety ◽  
Social Anxiety Disorder ◽  
Perspective Taking ◽  
Relational Responding ◽  
Deictic Relational Responding

scholarly journals Healthy selfing: Theoretically optimal environments for the development of tacting and deictic relational responding

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison Stapleton ◽  
Louise McHugh
Keyword(s):  
Relational Frame Theory ◽  
Sense Of Self ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Frame Theory ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Private Events ◽  
Relational Responding ◽  
Relational Frame ◽  
Current Evidence Base ◽  
Deictic Relational Responding

  From a relational frame theory perspective, our sense of self is a by-product of language that arises from transformation of stimulus functions through relational framing of our own responding. In this way, selfing is an important action that allows us to clarify our needs, wants, and what matters to us. Tacting and deictic relational responding are two processes that are instrumental to the development of a healthy selfing repertoire. This paper provides an overview of tacting and deictic relational responding in accordance with relational frame theory in addition to features of an optimal environment for shaping these processes. In terms of tacting, it is important to consider learning environment sensitivity, consequence availability, the individual’s experience, and to facilitate rich discussions of private events. In terms of deictic relational responding, it is important to provide frequent interactions that contain multiple exemplars of distinctions between self and others in addition to rich discussions of private events while also tailoring to the individual when drawing from training protocols. We conclude with a brief overview of the current evidence base regarding the identified features.

Cognitive gadgets: A provocative but flawed manifesto

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Del Giudice
Keyword(s):  
Theory Of Mind ◽  
Cultural Differences ◽  
Twin Studies ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Evolutionary Approach ◽  
Genetic Inheritance ◽  
Double Standards ◽  
Cross Cultural Differences ◽  
Cherry Picking ◽  
Dichotomous Thinking

Abstract The argument against innatism at the heart of Cognitive Gadgets is provocative but premature, and is vitiated by dichotomous thinking, interpretive double standards, and evidence cherry-picking. I illustrate my criticism by addressing the heritability of imitation and mindreading, the relevance of twin studies, and the meaning of cross-cultural differences in theory of mind development. Reaching an integrative understanding of genetic inheritance, plasticity, and learning is a formidable task that demands a more nuanced evolutionary approach.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document