Assessment and treatment of personality disorders: A behavioral perspective.

2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosemery O. Nelson-Gray ◽  
Christopher M. Lootens ◽  
John T. Mitchell ◽  
Christopher D. Robertson ◽  
Natalie E. Hundt ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 443-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosemery O. Nelson-Gray ◽  
John T. Mitchell ◽  
Nathan A. Kimbrel ◽  
Ruth M. Hurst

Author(s):  
Susan C. South ◽  
Thomas F. Oltmanns ◽  
Robert F. Krueger

The concept of personality disorder has existed throughout the history of psychology and psychiatry. The ten current personality disorders (PDs) listed in the DSM-IV are conceived of as distinct syndromes. Nevertheless, DSM-IV PDs overlap extensively with each other, with normal personality traits, and with Axis I psychopathology. Thus, many investigators suggest that, in DSM-5, the classification system for PDs should be revised to better reflect the closeness of the links between personality and psychopathology, perhaps by linking both constructs within broader spectrums of psychopathological variation. The most common and well-accepted suggestion is that the categorical diagnoses of DSM-IV should be replaced with a dimensional model of pathological personality traits, and the links between personality traits and more syndromal forms of psychopathology (Axis I disorders) should also be explicitly articulated. In this chapter, we review current research on how PDs are linked with broad spectrums of personality and psychopathology. Specifically, we examine (1) evidence relevant to the etiology and course of PDs, (2) how these disorders can best be assessed, and (3) evidence regarding the most effective practices in the treatment of PDs, with the aim of articulating how etiology, course, assessment, and treatment of PDs might be conceptualized in a spectrum-based classification system.


2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elsa F. Ronningstam ◽  
Shian-Ling Keng ◽  
Maria Elena Ridolfi ◽  
Mohammad Arbabi ◽  
Brin F.S. Grenyer

Author(s):  
William R. Lindsay ◽  
Verity Chester ◽  
Regi Alexander

Knowledge about the assessment of personality disorder (PD) in people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) has improved significantly in the last 15 years. Guidelines have been developed starting with recommendations by Alexander and Cooray (2003) that informant information, observation, and interview should be employed in a convergent assessment. Specific considerations should be given to the features of IDD itself such as delay in perspective taking abilities. While initial research found widely differing prevalence of PD in people with IDD, more recent research following guidelines, has been more consistent. It has also been demonstrated that PD has an orderly relationship with the assessment of general personality and with emotional problems. Recent alterations in the assessment of PD in the general population have been found suitable for people with IDD and it has also been found that generic services for this population are suitable for those with IDD and PD.


1976 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bridget Bryant ◽  
Peter Trower ◽  
Krysia Yardley ◽  
H. Urbieta ◽  
F. J. J. Letemendia

SynopsisAn investigation into the extent and nature of social inadequacy among outpatients diagnosed as neuroses and personality disorders was undertaken on patients aged 18–49 attending one clinic over a six-month period. A feature of this survey was that each patient took part in a standard social interaction test, and their performance was assessed by two psychologists. A relatively high proportion of patients, one in six on the most conservative estimate, and probably over one in four, were judged by psychologists and psychiatrists to be socially inadequate, and the results showed a clear pattern of behavioural, social and personality factors associated with these judgements. Implications for assessment and treatment are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document