Suffix delay and the terminal and preterminal suffix effects.

Author(s):  
Catherine G. Penney ◽  
Annette Godsell
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 183 ◽  
pp. 276-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna H. Lowenstein ◽  
Courtney Cribb ◽  
Popy Shell ◽  
Yi Yuan ◽  
Susan Nittrouer

1976 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward J. Rowe ◽  
W. Gordon Rowe

1978 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine G. Penney

Two groups of university students were presented with auditory lists of temporally grouped words for recall. The lists were immediately followed by either a redundant suffix, a nonredundant suffix or no suffix. One group of subjects was instructed to recall the items in strict serial order; the second group was required to write the last items first, indicating the position of all items in the list. According to Kahneman's (1973) account of the suffix effect, the interfering effect of the suffix should be eliminated when the suffix is segregated in a different group or perceptual unit from the memory items. The results did not support the prediction from Kahneman's hypothesis. An alternative account of the suffix effect was presented.


1987 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 423-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Karp Manning

1987 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 138-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marilyn L Turner ◽  
Linda B LaPointe ◽  
Judy Cantor ◽  
Carolyn H Reeves ◽  
Robin H Griffeth ◽  
...  

1984 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Karp Manning ◽  
Jamie Seidman Turner
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document