Sex differences in sources of social self-esteem.

1972 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 343-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Hollender
1997 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 899-907 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoon-Hee Kwon

This study investigated the relationships among sex, sex-role, perceived facial attractiveness, social self-esteem, and interest in clothing. Women, compared to men, indicated greater interest in clothing, while there were no significant sex differences on scores of perceived facial attractiveness or social self-esteem. Androgynous women scored higher than the feminine and undifferentiated women on their perceived facial attractiveness, social self-esteem, and interest in clothing. This finding supported the presupposition that androgynous women perceive themselves as having higher scores on social effectiveness and interest in clothing. Scores on perceived facial attractiveness were significantly related to women's and men's scores on social self-esteem and interest in clothing, implying that one's interest in clothing might be interpreted as a form of social skill which is associated with one's social self-esteem and one's facial attractiveness.


1987 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 859-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleanor W. Willemsen

72 college students took the Personal Attributes Questionnaire, the five-scale Offer Self-image Questionnaire, and the Need for Uniqueness scale. Differences in self-esteem and uniqueness scores among undifferentiated, feminine, masculine, and androgynous individuals were determined. The analysis showed that androgynous and masculine individuals had generally better self-esteem than feminine and undifferentiated individuals. There were sex differences in self-esteem only for sexual and for social self-esteem. These differences were predicted by sex-role orientation with men's sexual self-esteem being enhanced by masculinity and depressed by femininity, whereas women's social self-esteem was predicted by masculinity. Need for Uniqueness appears to be an aspect of self-esteem for women but not for men.


2003 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gisli H. Gudjonsson ◽  
Jon Fridrik Sigurdsson

Summary: The Gudjonsson Compliance Scale (GCS), the COPE Scale, and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale were administered to 212 men and 212 women. Multiple regression of the test scores showed that low self-esteem and denial coping were the best predictors of compliance in both men and women. Significant sex differences emerged on all three scales, with women having lower self-esteem than men, being more compliant, and using different coping strategies when confronted with a stressful situation. The sex difference in compliance was mediated by differences in self-esteem between men and women.


1969 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonard I. Jacobson ◽  
Stephen E. Berger ◽  
Jim Millham
Keyword(s):  

10.26524/1214 ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-22
Author(s):  
Munish Singh Rana ◽  
Poonam Rani
Keyword(s):  

1981 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 273-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Juni ◽  
Tobi Hershkowitz-Friedman

The incidence of looking at peers and at a figure in authority was recorded in unisex dyads of 20 men and 22 women. Differential looking at the authority (female experimenter) vs looking at peers was a positive function of self-esteem for men but not for women. These results do not support the notion that looking connotes a lack of self-esteem, while confirming other sex differences previously reported.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document