Effects of rate of stimulus presentation and penalty conditions on the discrimination learning of normal and retarded children.

1972 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Harter ◽  
Edward Zigler
1984 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 233-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. W. Deckner ◽  
S. A. Soraci ◽  
R. L. Blanton ◽  
J. T. Tapp

An automated laboratory that can be used in the study and training of child-clinical populations is described. In addition to enabling flexible and precise stimulus presentation, the system permits accurate response recording. These are requisites in research and training efforts concerned with such critical areas as errorless discrimination learning, adaptive generalization, and language acquisition. Training procedures that require the children to utilize visual, auditory, and bimodal stimuli can be automated with the system.


1974 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 417-425
Author(s):  
Stuart I. Ritterman ◽  
Nancy C. Freeman

Thirty-two college students were required to learn the relevant dimension in each of two randomized lists of auditorily presented stimuli. The stimuli consisted of seven pairs of CV nonsense syllables differing by two relevant dimension units and from zero to seven irrelevant dimension units. Stimulus dimensions were determined according to Saporta’s units of difference. No significant differences in performance as a function of number of the irrelevant dimensions nor characteristics of the relevant dimension were observed.


1996 ◽  
Vol 41 (11) ◽  
pp. 1109-1110
Author(s):  
Deborah G. Kemler Nelson

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. James Kehoe ◽  
Kristin G. Boesenberg ◽  
Natasha White ◽  
Benjamin Carr ◽  
Gabrielle Weidemann

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Roy ◽  
Carrie Blakeslee ◽  
Jean Geary Boal

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document