Repetition effects in dichotic presentation.

1972 ◽  
Vol 92 (2) ◽  
pp. 220-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wayne H. Bartz
Keyword(s):  
Repetition Effects ◽  
Dichotic Presentation

scholarly journals Accessing lexical memory: The transfer of word repetition effects across task and modality

1979 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Don L. Scarborough ◽  
Linda Gerard ◽  
Charles Cortese
Keyword(s):  
Repetition Effects ◽  
Lexical Memory ◽  
Word Repetition

scholarly journals The fate of the unexpected: Consequences of misprediction assessed using ERP repetition effects

2021 ◽  
Vol 1757 ◽  
pp. 147290
Author(s):  
Melinh K. Lai ◽  
Joost Rommers ◽  
Kara D. Federmeier
Keyword(s):  
Repetition Effects ◽  
Unexpected Consequences

Intraspeaker Priming across the New Zealand English Short Front Vowel Shift

2021 ◽  
pp. 002383092110530
Author(s):  
Dan Villarreal ◽  
Lynn Clark
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Corpus Linguistics ◽  
Repetition Effect ◽  
Front Vowel ◽  
Repetition Effects ◽  
Phonetic Variation ◽  
Syntactic Variation ◽  
Vowel Shift ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Linguistic Material

A growing body of research in psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and sociolinguistics shows that we have a strong tendency to repeat linguistic material that we have recently produced, seen, or heard. The present paper investigates whether priming effects manifest in continuous phonetic variation the way it has been reported in phonological, morphological, and syntactic variation. We analyzed nearly 60,000 tokens of vowels involved in the New Zealand English short front vowel shift (SFVS), a change in progress in which trap/dress move in the opposite direction to kit, from a topic-controlled corpus of monologues (166 speakers), to test for effects that are characteristic of priming phenomena: repetition, decay, and lexical boost. Our analysis found evidence for all three effects. Tokens that were relatively high and front tended to be followed by tokens that were also high and front; the repetition effect weakened with greater time between the prime and target; and the repetition effect was stronger if the prime and target belonged to (different tokens of) the same word. Contrary to our expectations, however, the cross-vowel effects suggest that the repetition effect responded not to the direction of vowel changes within the SFVS, but rather the peripherality of the tokens. We also found an interaction between priming behavior and gender, with stronger repetition effects among men than women. While these findings both indicate that priming manifests in continuous phonetic variation and provide further evidence that priming is among the factors providing structure to intraspeaker variation, they also challenge unitary accounts of priming phenomena.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document