Conditional response distributions in a multiple-choice probability-learning situtation.

1970 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 328-330
Author(s):  
James R. Erickson ◽  
Karen K. Block
Keyword(s):  
Probability Learning ◽  
Multiple Choice ◽  
Choice Probability ◽  
Conditional Response

Multiple-choice probability learning.

1969 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Block ◽  
James R. Erickson
Keyword(s):  
Probability Learning ◽  
Multiple Choice ◽  
Choice Probability

scholarly journals Twelve-choice probability learning with payoffs

1967 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. 353-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Forrest W. Young
Keyword(s):  
Probability Learning ◽  
Choice Probability

scholarly journals The utility of event variability in two choice probability learning

1968 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 143-144
Author(s):  
Joseph Halpern ◽  
Madison Dengler ◽  
Z. Joseph Ulehla
Keyword(s):  
Probability Learning ◽  
Choice Probability

Effects of Internal and External Control of Reinforcement on Binary-Choice Probability Learning

1972 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 255-260
Author(s):  
Marion Jacobs ◽  
Norman Tiber
Keyword(s):  
Probability Learning ◽  
Personal Control ◽  
Learning Task ◽  
External Control ◽  
Binary Choice ◽  
Choice Probability ◽  
Frequent Event ◽  
The Difference ◽  
And Performance ◽  
The Relationship

This study investigated the relationship between belief in one's ability to control reinforcements and performance in a binary-choice probability-learning situation under varying conditions of risk. The probability-learning task required S repeatedly to predict whether a red or green bulb would light up next. Red was programmed to occur 75% of the time. The sequence was random and not contingent upon Ss' responses. Rotter's Internal-External scale was used to select Ss who generally believed reinforcements were affected by their own behavior (internals) to compare with individuals who believed that most reinforcements were beyond personal control (externals). The conditions of risk were no-payoff, win or lose, win or break even, lose or break even, and reverse (lose for a correct guess and break even for an incorrect one). Performance on the reverse condition differed from all others, with Ss selecting the objectively more frequent event significantly less often. The difference resulted from the behavior of male externals and female internals, who predicted the less frequent event to avoid loss of chips. This is discussed within the framework of social learning theory.

The effect of knowledge of another’s accuracy on two-choice probability learning

1967 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 217-218
Author(s):  
William C. Horne ◽  
Milton E. Rosenbaum
Keyword(s):  
Probability Learning ◽  
Choice Probability

Effect of Instructions on a Two-Choice Probability Learning Task

1965 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 465-466
Author(s):  
Joseph R. Cautela
Keyword(s):  
Subjective Probability ◽  
Probability Learning ◽  
Learning Task ◽  
Choice Probability ◽  
Differential Effects ◽  
Probability Learning Task ◽  
Probability Task

The purpose of this experiment was to determine the differential effects of instructions on a two-choice probability task. One set of instructions emphasized the number correct on each side. Another set of instructions emphasized neither of the above. The results indicated that differences in instructions did not lead to differences in subjective probability for the three groups. All groups tended toward matching behavior.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document