Parental factors in the childhood of homosexuals.

1968 ◽  
Vol 73 (3, Pt.1) ◽  
pp. 201-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise B. Apperson ◽  
W. George McAdoo
Keyword(s):  
Parental Factors

Individual and parental factors related to meaning in life in adolescence

2012 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 317-336
Author(s):  
László Brassai ◽  
Bettina Pikó
Keyword(s):  
Meaning In Life ◽  
Parental Factors

Annak ellenére, hogy az élet értelmessége kiemelt fejlődés-lélektani cél, a szakirodalom elenyészően keveset foglalkozik az élet értelmességét meghatározó tényezőkkel serdülőkorban. Jelen tanulmányunkban egyéni szintű, szociokognitív és család szintű, kapcsolati tényezők szerepét vizsgáltuk az élet értelmességének a megélésében 15–19 éves (47,8%-a fiúk) erdélyi középiskolásoknál (N=1944). Míg az énhatékonyság, az önszabályozott viselkedés, a szülői társas támogatottsággal való elégedettség és az anyai elfogadó bánásmód pozitív, az apai ellenőrző bánásmód negatív összefüggést mutatott az élet megélt értelmességével, a vizsgált mintában. Ugyanakkor a társas összehasonlítás csak a fiúk, az apai elfogadó bánásmód pedig csak a lányok esetében függött össze az élet értelmességével. A talált eredmények felhívják a figyelmet azokra a szociokulturális hatásokra, amelyek a nemiszerep-szocializáció által érvényesülnek az élet értelmességének a megélésében serdülőkorban, egyben támpontokat adva a preventív és fejlesztő célú beavatkozások számára.

Parental Factors in Educational Mobility

1965 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth G. Cohen
Keyword(s):  
Educational Mobility ◽  
Parental Factors

Do Parental Factors Affect Male and Female Fertility?

Epidemiology ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 700-705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Joffe ◽  
Isobel Barnes
Keyword(s):  
Female Fertility ◽  
Parental Factors ◽  
Male And Female

Maternal and paternal overprotection of children born preterm: Relations to child and parental factors.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina Toscano ◽  
Isabel Soares ◽  
Joana Baptista ◽  
Vanessa Moutinho ◽  
Ralph C. A. Rippe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parental Factors

ENGLISH-MAJORED STUDENTS’ PERSPECTIVES ON THE FACTORS BOOSTING LEARNER AUTONOMY DEVELOPMENT

2020 ◽  
Vol 65 (12) ◽  
pp. 37-45
Author(s):  
Thao Tran Quoc ◽  
Dai Vo Quoc
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Content Analysis ◽  
Qualitative Data ◽  
Education Institution ◽  
Learner Autonomy ◽  
Ho Chi Minh City ◽  
Parental Factors ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Autonomy Development ◽  
Major Factors

This paper presents the findings of a qualitative study exploring students’ perspectives on the factors boosting learner autonomy (LA) development. This study involved 393 English-majored students from a Ho Chi Minh City based higher education institution in answering open-ended questionnaires. The content analysis approach was used to analyze the qualitative data. The findings revealed that three major factors, viz. teacher-related factors, school-related factors and parental factors were believed to positively affect students’ LA emergence. However, research participants reckoned that teacher-related factors had a major role in boosting students’ LA development while school-related factors and parental factors played contributing roles in shaping students’ LA.

William Bateson, Richard Goldschmidt, and Non-Genic Modes of Speciation

2003 ◽  
Vol 11 (04) ◽  
pp. 341-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. R. Forsdyke
Keyword(s):  
New Species ◽  
Base Composition ◽  
Hybrid Sterility ◽  
Parental Factors ◽  
Dna Base Composition ◽  
William Bateson ◽  
Dna Base ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Positive Effect ◽  
Richard Goldschmidt

Sometimes a cross between two individuals that appear to belong to the same species produces a sterile offspring (i.e., their hybrid is sterile). Thus, the two individuals appear reproductively isolated from each other. If each could find a compatible mate, then new species might emerge. At issue is whether the form of hybrid sterility that precedes sympatric differentiation into species is, in the general case, of genic or non-genic origin. Several recent papers lend the authority of William Bateson to the genic hypothesis, referring to the "Bateson–Dobzhansky–Muller hypothesis". All these papers cite a 1996 paper that, in turn, cites a 1909 paper of Bateson. However, from 1902 until 1926 the latter espoused a non-genic hypothesis that today would be classified as "chromosomal". Analysis of Bateson's 1909 text reveals no recantation. Bateson's non-genic view was similar to that advanced by Richard Goldschmidt in the 1940s. However, Bateson proposed a contribution from parents of abstract factors that, together in their hybrids, complement to bring about a negative effect (hybrid sterility). In contrast, Goldschmidt proposed that normally parents contribute complementary factors making parental chromosomes compatible at meiosis in their hybrids, which hence are fertile (i.e., the parental factors work together to produce a positive effect). When the factors are not sufficiently complementary the parental chromosomes are incompatible in their hybrids, which hence are sterile. The non-genic Batesonian–Goldschmidtian abstractions are now being fleshed-out chemically in terms of DNA base-composition differences.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document