Response meaningfulness in paired associates: T-L frequency, m, and number of meanings (dm).

1967 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 313-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eli Saltz ◽  
Vito Modigliani
1965 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 491-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald J. Mueller ◽  
Robert M. W. Travers

Each of 34 Ss was presented with a list of 12 paired associates which were arranged according to high-low or low-high stimulus and response meaningfulness and also in a simultaneous or sequential time relationship. Meaningfulness level on the stimulus side of the dyad rather than on the response side was found to be more crucial for learning, and significantly more learning occurred also when the dyads were presented in the simultaneous condition. The findings were discussed in terms of both association theory and the differences between the present procedure and the conventional anticipation method.


2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario O. de Jonge ◽  
Diane Pecher ◽  
Jan W. Van Strien ◽  
Huib Tabbers ◽  
Rene Zeelenberg

1968 ◽  
Vol 78 (3, Pt.1) ◽  
pp. 494-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Calvin F. Nodine ◽  
James H. Korn

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (11) ◽  
pp. 1768-1778 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kit W. Cho ◽  
James H. Neely ◽  
Michael K. Brennan ◽  
Deana Vitrano ◽  
Stephanie Crocco
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document