Reduced stimulus intensity as a CS in GSR conditioning.

1967 ◽  
Vol 73 (4, Pt.1) ◽  
pp. 631-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. Champion
Keyword(s):  
Stimulus Intensity

Reflex Responses in Upper Limb Muscles to Cutaneous Stimuli

1993 ◽  
Vol 20 (04) ◽  
pp. 271-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Chen
Keyword(s):  
Stimulus Intensity ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Voluntary Contraction ◽  
Cutaneous Reflexes ◽  
Focal Lesions ◽  
Normal Ranges ◽  
Conduction Velocities ◽  
Limb Muscles ◽  
Biphasic Responses

ABSTRACT:Cutaneous reflexes in the upper limb were elicited by stimulating digital nerves and recorded by averaging rectified EMG from proximal and distal upper limb muscles during voluntary contraction. Distal muscles often showed a triphasic response: an inhibition with onset about 50 ms (Il) followed by a facilitation with onset about 60 ms (E2) followed by another inhibition with onset about 80 ms (12). Proximal muscles generally showed biphasic responses beginning with facilitation or inhibition with onset at about 40 ms. Normal ranges for the amplitude of these components were established from recordings on 22 arms of 11 healthy subjects. An attempt was made to determine the alterent fibers responsible for the various components by varying the stimulus intensity, by causing ischemic block of larger fibers and by estimating the afferent conduction velocities. The central pathways mediating these reflexes were examined by estimating central delays and by studying patients with focal lesions

Olfactory mucosal and neural responses in the frog

1962 ◽  
Vol 203 (2) ◽  
pp. 353-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maxwell Mark Mozell
Keyword(s):  
Stimulus Intensity ◽  
Olfactory Epithelium ◽  
Flow Rate ◽  
Olfactory Nerve ◽  
Neural Responses ◽  
Criterion Measure ◽  
Repeated Stimulation ◽  
Two Measures ◽  
Electrophysiological Technique

A comparatively recent electrophysiological technique for studying peripheral olfactory events is to record sustained negative potentials from the olfactory epithelium. This method is rapidly replacing the older technique of recording multifiber discharges from the olfactory nerve or bulb. Therefore, the extent to which the results from the two methods correlate with each other was studied by simultaneously recording from the nerve and from the mucosa under several conditions. Although most often parallel, some differences between the two measures were found. Their response maxima did not always temporally coincide. Their amplitudes did not always correlate. Certain stimuli reduced subsequent mucosal responses but not the neural. Repeated stimulation sometimes produced similar differences. Finally, the two responses were not linearly related as a function of stimulus intensity or flow rate. However, for reasons discussed, it is difficult to conclude that these discrepancies necessarily reflect unfavorably upon the reliability of the mucosal potential as the criterion measure of peripheral olfactory activity. Nevertheless, the mucosal potential should not be accepted unequivocally as such a criterion measure until it is more thoroughly understood.

scholarly journals Self-generation and sound intensity interactively modulate perceptual bias, but not perceptual sensitivity

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadia Paraskevoudi ◽  
Iria SanMiguel
Keyword(s):  
Stimulus Intensity ◽  
Empirical Support ◽  
Sound Intensity ◽  
Perceptual Bias ◽  
Perceptual Processing ◽  
Interactive Effects ◽  
Just Noticeable Difference ◽  
External Sources ◽  
Motor Actions ◽  
Near Threshold

AbstractThe ability to distinguish self-generated stimuli from those caused by external sources is critical for all behaving organisms. Although many studies point to a sensory attenuation of self-generated stimuli, recent evidence suggests that motor actions can result in either attenuated or enhanced perceptual processing depending on the environmental context (i.e., stimulus intensity). The present study employed 2-AFC sound detection and loudness discrimination tasks to test whether sound source (self- or externally-generated) and stimulus intensity (supra- or near-threshold) interactively modulate detection ability and loudness perception. Self-generation did not affect detection and discrimination sensitivity (i.e., detection thresholds and Just Noticeable Difference, respectively). However, in the discrimination task, we observed a significant interaction between self-generation and intensity on perceptual bias (i.e. Point of Subjective Equality). Supra-threshold self-generated sounds were perceived softer than externally-generated ones, while at near-threshold intensities self-generated sounds were perceived louder than externally-generated ones. Our findings provide empirical support to recent theories on how predictions and signal intensity modulate perceptual processing, pointing to interactive effects of intensity and self-generation that seem to be driven by a biased estimate of perceived loudness, rather by changes in detection and discrimination sensitivity.

Does Motion Perception Follow Weber's Law?

Perception ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 363-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes M Zanker
Keyword(s):  
Motion Perception ◽  
Stimulus Intensity ◽  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Weber’S Law ◽  
Noise Levels ◽  
Signal To Noise ◽  
Weber's Law ◽  
The Absolute ◽  
Noise Ratio ◽  
Random Dot Patterns

The subjective strength of a percept often depends on the stimulus intensity in a nonlinear way. Such coding is often reflected by the observation that the just-noticeable difference between two stimulus intensities (JND) is proportional to the absolute stimulus intensity. This behaviour, which is usually referred to as Weber's Law, can be interpreted as a compressive nonlinearity extending the operating range of a sensory system. When the noise superimposed on a motion stimulus is increased along a logarithmic scale (in order to provide linear steps in subjective difference) in motion-coherency measurements, observers often report that the subjective differences between the various noise levels increase together with the absolute level. This observation could indicate a deviation from Weber's Law for variation of motion strength as obtained by changing the signal-to-noise ratio in random-dot kinematograms. Thus JNDs were measured for the superposition of uncorrelated random-dot patterns on static random-dot patterns and three types of motion stimuli realised as random-dot kinematograms, namely large-field and object ‘Fourier’ motion (all or a group of dots move coherently), ‘drift-balanced’ motion (a travelling region of static dots), and paradoxical ‘theta’ motion (the dots on the surface of an object move in opposite direction to the object itself). For all classes of stimuli, the JNDs when expressed as differences in signal-to-noise ratio turned out to increase with the signal-to-noise ratio, whereas the JNDs given as percentage of superimposed noise appear to be similar for all tested noise levels. Thus motion perception is in accordance with Weber's Law when the signal-to-noise ratio is regarded as stimulus intensity, which in turn appears to be coded in a nonlinear fashion. In general the Weber fractions are very large, indicating a poor differential sensitivity in signal-to-noise measurements.

scholarly journals Appetitive behavioral traits and stimulus intensity influence maintenance of conditioned fear

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan E. Olshavsky ◽  
Carolyn E. Jones ◽  
Hongjoo J. Lee ◽  
Marie-H. Monfils
Keyword(s):  
Stimulus Intensity ◽  
Conditioned Fear ◽  
Behavioral Traits

Effects of Stimulus Intensity on Latency and Conduction Time of Short-Latency Somatosensory Evoked Potentials

2001 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Shiga ◽  
T. Yamada ◽  
A. Ofuji ◽  
Y. Fujita ◽  
T. Kawamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Stimulus Intensity ◽  
Somatosensory Evoked Potentials ◽  
Short Latency ◽  
Conduction Time
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document