Outcome Questionnaire-45 (OQ-45) progress alert rates in group versus individual treatment: An archival replication.

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 247-260
Author(s):  
Cameron Alldredge ◽  
Gary Burlingame ◽  
Joseph Olsen ◽  
Jake Van Epps
Keyword(s):  
Group Versus ◽  
Individual Treatment ◽  
Outcome Questionnaire

No differences between group versus individual treatment of childhood anxiety disorders in a randomised clinical trial

2008 ◽  
Vol 49 (8) ◽  
pp. 886-893 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliette M. Liber ◽  
Brigit M. Van Widenfelt ◽  
Elisabeth M.W.J. Utens ◽  
Robert F. Ferdinand ◽  
Adelinde J.M. Van der Leeden ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Randomised Clinical Trial ◽  
Childhood Anxiety ◽  
Individual Treatment ◽  
Childhood Anxiety Disorders

Cognitive Behavioral Treatment in Clinically Referred Chronic Insomniacs: Group Versus Individual Treatment

2006 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 135-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid H. Verbeek ◽  
Gerdy M. Konings ◽  
Albert P. Aldenkamp ◽  
August C. Declerck ◽  
Ed C. Klip
Keyword(s):  
Behavioral Treatment ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Cognitive Behavioral ◽  
Individual Treatment ◽  
Cognitive Behavioral Treatment ◽  
Clinically Referred

scholarly journals Group versus individual treatment for substance use disorders: a study protocol for the COMDAT trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sidsel Helena Karsberg ◽  
Mads Uffe Pedersen ◽  
Morten Hesse ◽  
Birgitte Thylstrup ◽  
Michael Mulbjerg Pedersen
Keyword(s):  
Substance Use ◽  
Drug Use ◽  
Substance Use Disorders ◽  
Group Treatment ◽  
Burden Of Illness ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Individual Treatment ◽  
Drug And Alcohol

Abstract Background Alcohol and other drug use disorders contribute substantially to the global burden of illness. The majority of people with substance use disorders do not receive any treatment for their problems, and developing treatments that are attractive and effective to patients should be a priority. However, whether treatment is best delivered in a group format or an individual format has only been studied to a very limited degree. The COMDAT (Combined Drug and Alcohol Treatment) trial evaluates the feasibility, acceptability, and cost effectiveness of MOVE group (MOVE-G) treatment versus MOVE individual (MOVE-I) treatment in four community-based outpatient treatment centres in Denmark. Methods A two-arm non-inferiority trial comparing MOVE-I (Pedersen et al., Drug Alcohol Depend 218:108363, 2020) with MOVE-G a combined group treatment for both alcohol use disorder and drug use disorder. The primary objective is to examine whether MOVE-G is non-inferior to MOVE-I in relation to abstinence from drug and/or alcohol, number of sessions received, and completion of treatment as planned. All participants will receive treatment based on cognitive behavioral therapy and motivational interviewing, vouchers for attendance and text reminders, as well as medication as needed (MOVE). Participants (n = 300) will be recruited over a one-year period at four public treatment centers in four Danish municipalities. A short screening will determine eligibility and randomization status. Hereafter, participants will be randomized to the two treatment arms. A thorough baseline assessment will be conducted approximately 1 week after randomization. Follow-up assessments will be conducted at 9 months post-randomization. In addition, patients’ use of drugs and alcohol, and patients’ wellbeing will be measured in all sessions. The main outcome measures are drug and alcohol intake at 9 months follow-up, number of sessions attended, and dropout from treatment. Discussion The present study will examine the potential and efficacy of combined groups (patients with alcohol and drug disorders in the same group) versus individually based treatment both based on the treatment method MOVE (Pedersen et al., Drug Alcohol Depend 218:108363, 2020). Trial registration ISRCTN88025085, registration date 30/06/2020.

Group versus individual treatment in obsessions without compulsions

2005 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. O'Connor ◽  
M. H. Freeston ◽  
D. Gareau ◽  
Y. Careau ◽  
M. J. Dufour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Group Versus ◽  
Individual Treatment

The Development of Language-Training Programs for Postrubella Hearing-Impaired Children

1973 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Lynch ◽  
Annette Tobin
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Impaired ◽  
Treatment Programs ◽  
Individual Treatment ◽  
Target Behaviors ◽  
Systematic Fashion ◽  
Development Of Language ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Impaired Children ◽  
Hearing Impaired Children

This paper presents the procedures developed and used in the individual treatment programs for a group of preschool, postrubella, hearing-impaired children. A case study illustrates the systematic fashion in which the clinician plans programs for each child on the basis of the child’s progress at any given time during the program. The clinician’s decisions are discussed relevant to (1) the choice of a mode(s) for the child and the teacher, (2) the basis for selecting specific target behaviors, (3) the progress of each program, and (4) the implications for future programming.

Differential Efficacy of Group Versus Individual Format Using Equivalent Treatments

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jyssica D. Seebeck ◽  
Shelli Jones ◽  
Gary M. Burlingame
Keyword(s):  
Group Versus
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document