Maybe they’re born with it, or maybe it’s experience: Toward a deeper understanding of the learning style myth.

2020 ◽  
Vol 112 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaylene E. Nancekivell ◽  
Priti Shah ◽  
Susan A. Gelman
Keyword(s):  
Learning Style

An Investigation of Learning Style and Discipline in a Human Factors Course

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark C. Schall ◽  
Michelle L. Rusch ◽  
Geb Thomas ◽  
John D. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Human Factors ◽  
Learning Style

Effect of Learning Style Interventions on Course Satisfaction

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura S. Testerman ◽  
Nichole C. Hardy ◽  
Matthew T. Tatum ◽  
Holly M. Irwin-Chase ◽  
Jim Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Learning Style ◽  
Course Satisfaction

Reliability and Validity of the VARK: A Learning Style Assessment

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew T. Tatum ◽  
Nichole C. Hardy ◽  
Laura S. Testerman ◽  
Holly M. Irwin-Chase ◽  
John T. Wu
Keyword(s):  
Learning Style ◽  
Reliability And Validity

HUBUNGAN GAYA BELAJAR SISWA TERHADAP ASPEK PENGETAHUAN SISWA PADA MATA PELAJARAN SISTEM KOMPUTER DI SMK IT RAHMATAN KARIMAH BENGKULU TENGAH

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (01) ◽  
pp. 13-20
Author(s):  
Dian Saputra
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Computer System ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Analysis Techniques ◽  
Post Test ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Relationship

This study aims to find out the relationship between learning style and students’ knowledge aspect on Computer System Subject at SMK IT Rahmatan Karimah of  Central Bengkulu, the type of research is quantitative and the subject of research is grade X in SMK IT Rahmatan Karimah of  Central Bengkulu. Data collection techniques using observation, Questionnaire and documentation. Data analysis techniques used were Descriptive Analysis, and inferential Statistical Analysis. The results of visual learning style post-test were 11 people with a mean of 76.36, an auditory learning style of 8 people at a mean of 62.14, a kinesthetic learning style of 3 people at a mean of 50.33, apart from that (r x y = 2.35) and the magnitude of r is reflected in the table (r table = 0.4132). Then rxy > r table ie = 2.35> 0.4132. In other words, Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. It has a significant relationship between the learning styles of students and students’ knowledge aspect on Computer System Subject of grade X TKJ in SMK IT Rahmatan Karimah of  Central Bengkulu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document