scholarly journals Effects of a year long supplemental reading intervention for students with reading difficulties in fourth grade.

2017 ◽  
Vol 109 (8) ◽  
pp. 1103-1119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanne Wanzek ◽  
Yaacov Petscher ◽  
Stephanie Al Otaiba ◽  
Brenna K. Rivas ◽  
Francesca G. Jones ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. 394-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn A. Denton ◽  
Kim Nimon ◽  
Patricia G. Mathes ◽  
Elizabeth A. Swanson ◽  
Caroline Kethley ◽  
...  

This effectiveness study examined a supplemental reading intervention that may be appropriate as one component of a response-to-intervention (RTI) system. First-grade students in 31 schools who were at risk for reading difficulties were randomly assigned to receive Responsive Reading Instruction (RRI; Denton, 2001; Denton & Hocker, 2006; n = 182) or typical school practice (TSP; n = 40). About 43% of the TSP students received an alternate school-provided supplemental reading intervention. Results indicated that the RRI group had significantly higher outcomes than the TSP group on multiple measures of reading. About 91% of RRI students and 79% of TSP students met word reading criteria for adequate intervention response, but considerably fewer met a fluency benchmark.


2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 318-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen D. Ritchey ◽  
Rebecca D. Silverman ◽  
Elizabeth A. Montanaro ◽  
Deborah L. Speece ◽  
Christopher Schatschneider

2021 ◽  
pp. 026565902198940
Author(s):  
Jessica Dean ◽  
Michelle Pascoe ◽  
Jane le Roux

Information and communication technology (ICT)-based reading interventions have potential to help children with reading difficulties, especially those in resource-constrained environments who otherwise might not have access to support. This pilot study aimed to describe the impact of an online, partner-supported reading intervention designed for South African children with reading difficulties. Objectives were to qualitatively describe participants’ experience of the intervention, and quantitatively evaluate changes in reading accuracy, rate, comprehension and receptive vocabulary after intervention. Two studies were conducted: (1) A retrospective analysis using data from intervention in mainstream Cape Town schools with peers as reading partners; (2) A prospective study in a Cape Town school with special needs educational provision where speech-language therapists served as reading partners. Both studies used matched participant, pre/post intervention designs. A total of 40 children in grades 3 to 6 participated. In each study the intervention group ( n = 20) received intervention 3 times per week (30 minutes per session) for 10 weeks, while the control group ( n = 20) continued with regular school activities. Participants enjoyed the ICT-based intervention, valued the role of the reading partners, believed they had made literacy gains, and reported positive attitudinal and behavioural changes related to reading. Retrospective analysis revealed no statistically significant differences between intervention and control groups. The prospective study found a statistically significant difference between the intervention and control groups’ gains on one measure of reading rate, but no significant difference in reading accuracy, vocabulary or reading comprehension gains. The study provides a preliminary description of one ICT-based reading intervention. Although an intervention effect could not be demonstrated, the changes noted in reading rate together with qualitative findings suggest a need for further research.


2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 159-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eunsoo Cho ◽  
Garrett J. Roberts ◽  
Philip Capin ◽  
Greg Roberts ◽  
Jeremy Miciak ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 073194872095812
Author(s):  
Miriam McBreen ◽  
Robert Savage

This research assessed the impact of combining small-group cognitive reading intervention with a motivational program targeting students’ goals, emotions, and self-efficacy beliefs on the reading performance and motivation of third-grade students at-risk for reading difficulties ( n = 25, Mage = 8.99, SD = 0.38). Using a quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test efficacy trial design, effects of the intervention on phonological awareness, listening comprehension, accuracy, fluency, reading comprehension, and motivation were assessed. Results indicate that compared with students who received Cognitive-Only reading intervention, students who received the combined Cognitive plus Motivational reading intervention showed greater gains in reading comprehension and phonological awareness. Findings provide preliminary evidence that supplementing cognitive reading intervention with the proposed motivational program can improve the reading performance of students at-risk for reading difficulties.


2019 ◽  
Vol 111 (3) ◽  
pp. 373-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon Vaughn ◽  
Leticia R. Martinez ◽  
Kelly J. Williams ◽  
Jeremy Miciak ◽  
Anna-Mária Fall ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 277-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanne Wanzek ◽  
Yaacov Petscher ◽  
Stephanie Al Otaiba ◽  
Rachel E. Donegan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document