Framing-effects as a result of decision-heuristics and information processing mode

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Volker Stocke
2017 ◽  
Vol 120 (3) ◽  
pp. 391-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Ge ◽  
Xiaofang Zhong ◽  
Wenbo Luo

Internet addition affects facial expression recognition of individuals. However, evidences of facial expression recognition from different types of addicts are insufficient. The present study addressed the question by adopting eye-movement analytical method and focusing on the difference in facial expression recognition between internet-addicted and non-internet-addicted urban left-behind children in China. Sixty 14-year-old Chinese participants performed tasks requiring absolute recognition judgment and relative recognition judgment. The results show that the information processing mode adopted by the internet-addicted involved earlier gaze acceleration, longer fixation durations, lower fixation counts, and uniform extraction of pictorial information. The information processing mode of the non-addicted showed the opposite pattern. Moreover, recognition and processing of negative emotion pictures were relatively complex, and it was especially difficult for urban internet-addicted left-behind children to process negative emotion pictures in fine judgment and processing stage of recognition on differences as demonstrated by longer fixation duration and inadequate fixation counts.


1996 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerwen Jou ◽  
James Shanteau ◽  
Richard Jackson Harris

2010 ◽  
Vol 107 (2) ◽  
pp. 587-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaume Masip ◽  
Eugenio Garrido ◽  
Carmen Herrero

Masip, et al. (2009) conducted a study in which observers had to make truth–lie judgments at the beginning, middle, or end of a series of videotaped statements. They found a decline in truth judgments over time and explained this finding in terms of information processing mode. Recently, Elaad (2010) challenged this explanation and contended that the decline could be a result of regression toward the mean. In the present paper, it is argued that because Masip, et al. took multiple Moment 1 judgments over time and then averaged across judgments, regression toward the mean was extremely unlikely. Furthermore, the decrease in truth judgments was found under several separate conditions; this cannot be explained by random fluctuations alone. Finally, Masip, et al.'s data were re-analyzed adjusting for the effects of regression toward the mean. The outcomes of these analyses were the same as those reported in the original article.


2008 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 1079-1085 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tytus Sosnowski ◽  
Andrzej Rynkiewicz

2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong-Fang LIU ◽  
Li-Na SU ◽  
Huai-Yong WANG

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document